Literature DB >> 6592976

Components of adult Class III open-bite malocclusion.

E Ellis, J A McNamara.   

Abstract

In an effort to identify the frequency and differences in the dental and skeletal components of a large sample of adults with Class III malocclusion, with and without open bite, 176 subjects, one half of whom had an anterior open bite, were evaluated. These subjects were chosen by looking at the lateral cephalometric radiographs that were taken of 302 adults (128 men and 174 women) who exhibited at least an end-to-end Class III molar and canine relationship. The dental overbite was calculated for all subjects, and those with a negative overbite were placed in the open-bite (OB) group. Those with a positive overbite were placed in the non-open-bite (non-OB) group. The dental overbite was the only criterion used to define the open-bite and non-open-bite groups. The open-bite subjects were paired with a non-open-bite subject by sex, presence of presurgical orthodontic treatment, and anterior cranial base length. Eighty-eight subjects in each group (43 men and 45 women) were obtained. Various measures of craniofacial structure were calculated and analyzed by comparing the OB and non-OB groups with the paired t test. The areas that showed significant differences (p less than 0.05) between the OB and non-OB groups were as follows: the posterior maxilla exhibited vertical excess in the OB group; the maxillary occlusal plane was less steep in the OB group; the mandibular occlusal plane was more steep in the OB group; the gonial angle was higher in the OB group; the mandibular plane angle was higher in the OB group; the mandibular ramus was positioned in a more downward and backward location in the OB group; the total anterior facial height and lower facial height were increased in the OB group; the vertical height of the anterior maxilla was increased in the OB group; and the mandible was less protrusive in the OB group. No significant intergroup differences were noted in the cranial base, the anteroposterior position of the maxilla or the upper and lower incisors, the palatal plane, posterior facial height, mandibular ramus height, or mandibular body height. The results of this analysis indicate that the average Class III open-bite malocclusion is characterized by aberrations in both the maxilla and the mandible. Surgical therapy may, therefore, require intervention in both jaws to correct this deformity successfully.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6592976     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(84)90138-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  14 in total

1.  Combined treatment of open bite - long-term evaluation and relapse factors.

Authors:  Susanne Wriedt; Verena Buhl; Bilal Al-Nawas; Heiner Wehrbein
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-08-02       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  [Evaluation for vertical stability after various orthognathic surgical treatment plans for skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion with anterior open-bite].

Authors:  Liu Xianwen; Ai Weijian; Zhou Huixi; Li Yunfeng; Liu Shuguang
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2017-10-01

3.  Morphology of open bite.

Authors:  Karl-Friedrich Krey; Karl-Heinz Dannhauer; Thomas Hierl
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  A novel machine learning model for class III surgery decision.

Authors:  Hunter Lee; Sunna Ahmad; Michael Frazier; Mehmet Murat Dundar; Hakan Turkkahraman
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 2.341

5.  Treatment of maxillary deficiency by miniplates: a case report.

Authors:  Rahman Showkatbakhsh; Abdolreza Jamilian; Mohammad Behnaz
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2011-05-10

6.  Bone remodeling to correct maxillary deficiency after growth cessation.

Authors:  Rahman Showkatbakhsh; Alireza Ghassemi; Marcus Gerressen; Mehrangiz Ghassemi; Abdolreza Jamilian; Shadab Mohammad; Uma S Pal
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-07

7.  Skeletal and dentoalveolar features in patients with deep overbite malocclusion.

Authors:  Hamidreza Fattahi; Hamidreza Pakshir; Neda Afzali Baghdadabadi; Shervin Shahian Jahromi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2014-11-30

8.  Stability of the anterior maxillary segment and teeth after segmental le fort I osteotomy and postoperative skeletal elastic fixation with or without occlusal splint.

Authors:  Tue Lindberg Blæhr; Thomas Jensen; Karen Margrethe Due; Bjarne Neumann-Jensen
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2014-10-01

9.  The Effects of Maxillary Protraction with or without Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Age Factors in Treating Class III Malocclusion: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Hong-Chen Qu; Mo Yu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A comparative evaluation of skeletal, dental, and soft tissue changes with skeletal anchored and conventional facemask protraction therapy.

Authors:  Tulika Tripathi; Priyank Rai; Navneet Singh; Shilpa Kalra
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.