| Literature DB >> 6592204 |
J H de Vree, M C Peters, A J Plasschaert.
Abstract
In this study, two different cavity designs were compared from a mechanical point of view: (a) an axisymmetric model of a conventional class 1 cavity preparation and restoration; and (b) an axisymmetric model of a modified cavity design. The modified design was characterized by a cavo-surface angle (c.s.a.) of approximately 90 degrees and a stepped cavity wall. Using a mathematical model, stresses were calculated by finite element analysis to compare the force distribution. It is concluded that the clinical superiority of the modified cavity design, with respect to the marginal breakdown of the amalgam restoration, can be supported by stress calculations.Mesh:
Year: 1984 PMID: 6592204 DOI: 10.1177/00220345840630101001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Dent Res ISSN: 0022-0345 Impact factor: 6.116