Literature DB >> 6589106

Relative effectiveness of a rotary and conventional toothbrush in plaque removal.

T F Walsh, H D Glenwright.   

Abstract

The ability of a powered rotary toothbrush to remove 3- and 4-day-old microbial plaque deposits was evaluated in 10 young adults with healthy gingivae. Using a split mouth technique and a cross-over experimental design, the powered brush was compared with a conventional hand brush over a 14-day period. Statistical analysis of the results showed no significant differences between either method of brushing when the whole mouth, maxillary or mandibular arches were compared. Further analysis of the proximal scores again showed no significant differences between the powered brush or handbrush. The majority of the subjects preferred the conventional handbrush to the powered brush.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6589106     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1984.tb01430.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol        ISSN: 0301-5661            Impact factor:   3.383


  2 in total

Review 1.  Powered versus manual toothbrushing for oral health.

Authors:  Munirah Yaacob; Helen V Worthington; Scott A Deacon; Chris Deery; A Damien Walmsley; Peter G Robinson; Anne-Marie Glenny
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-06-17

2.  Effect of a home telecare program on oral health among adults with tetraplegia: a pilot study.

Authors:  H K Yuen
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 2.772

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.