Literature DB >> 6588512

The clinical assessment of duodenogastric reflux by scintigraphy and its relation to histological changes in gastric mucosa.

W E Thomas, M J Cooper, N J Mortensen, P A Burton, E R Davies.   

Abstract

Fifty-seven patients undergoing routine or review gastroscopy had multiple gastric biopsies taken and assessed histologically for gastritis, metaplasia and dysplasia. Duodenogastric reflux was graded scintigraphically by BIDA Scanning. Patients with dysplastic changes in the gastric mucosa (n = 33) had a higher mean grade of reflux 2.1 +/- 0.21 (mean +/- SEM) than patients with no dysplasia (1.1 +/- 0.24: P less than 0.0025). Patients with metaplasia (n = 33) had an increased mean grade of reflux of 2.0 +/- 0.19 compared with patients without metaplasia (1.3 +/- 0.29: P less than 0.05), but there was no significant difference in degree of reflux between patients with and without gastritis. When the grade of reflux was plotted against increasing degrees of mucosal abnormalities, there appeared to be a positive correlation between duodenogastric reflux and severity of mucosal change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6588512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl        ISSN: 0085-5928


  10 in total

1.  Duodenogastric reflux after choledochoduodenostomy.

Authors:  W Ali; D K Agarwal; S S Sikora; B R Mittal; N Krishnani; M Ibrarullah; R K Gupta; S P Kaushik
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Scintigraphic evaluation of enterogastric reflux using 75Se-HCAT: methodology and first clinical observations.

Authors:  A Furno; G Sciarretta; G Fagioli; R Pozzato; P Malaguti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1987

3.  Reconsideration of delayed gastric emptying in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Yan-Shen Shan; Mei-Ling Tsai; Nan-Tsing Chiu; Pin-Wen Lin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Comparative evaluation of scintigraphy and upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy for detection of duodenogastric reflux.

Authors:  B R Mittal; M Ibrarullah; D K Agarwal; A Maini; W Ali; S S Sikora; B K Das
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.668

5.  Screening procedures for identifying patients after gastric operations at high risk of developing premalignant histological changes.

Authors:  F Mosimann; I A Donovan; H Thompson; J W Fielding; L K Harding; J Alexander-Williams
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Comparative evaluation of intragastric bile acids and hepatobiliary scintigraphy in the diagnosis of duodenogastric reflux.

Authors:  Teng-Fei Chen; Praveen K Yadav; Rui-Jin Wu; Wei-Hua Yu; Chang-Qin Liu; Hui Lin; Zhan-Ju Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Early gastric cancer: the case for long term surveillance.

Authors:  P W Houghton; N J Mortensen; A Allan; R C Williamson; J D Davies
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-08-03

8.  Duodeno-gastric reflux and gastric adenomas: a scintigraphic study in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  A D Spigelman; M Granowska; R K Phillips
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 18.000

9.  Cholecystectomy, duodeno-gastric reflux and polyposis.

Authors:  A D Spigelman; J P Thomson; R K Phillips
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 18.000

10.  Twenty-seventh annual general meeting of the British Association for Cancer Research (in conjunction with the inaugural meeting of the Association of Cancer Physicians). March 24-26, 1986, Bristol, UK. Abstracts.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.