Literature DB >> 6585813

Disparate differentiation in mouse hemopoietic colonies derived from paired progenitors.

T Suda, J Suda, M Ogawa.   

Abstract

We analyzed the differentiation of murine hemopoietic colonies derived from paired progenitors in culture. Single progenitors were isolated by use of a micromanipulation technique from blast cell colonies cultured from the spleens of 5-fluorouracil-treated mice. Eighteen to 24 hr later, the paired progenitors were separated with a micromanipulator and cultured in methylcellulose medium containing erythropoietin and pokeweed-mitogen spleen cell conditioned medium. Six to nine days later, the two colonies derived from the paired progenitors were individually picked and differential counts were performed by using May-Grunwald-Giemsa stain. The abbreviations used here are n, neutrophil; m, macrophage; e, eosinophil; mast, mast cell; M, megakaryocyte; E, erythrocyte. Of a total of 387 pairs that could be evaluated, 68 were pairs of colonies consisting of dissimilar combinations of cell lineages such as m-nmmastEM, M-nmmastEM, nm-nmmastEM, nmmastM-nmmastEM, M-nmmastM, nmmast-nmmastM, nm-nmmastE, M-nmM, n-nmM, mM-nmM, m-nmmast, nm-nme, me-nm, mM-nm, n-ne, m-mmast, m-mM, M-nm, M-mM, E-nm, m-nm, M-m, etc. Thirty-nine were homologous pairs revealing identical lineage combinations such as nmmastEM, nmmastM, nmmast, mmastEM, nmEM, nme, nmM, mM, and nm lineages. However, in members of some of these pairs, the proportions of the individual cell lineages were significantly different. The remainder were pairs of single lineage colonies. Paired progenitors obtained from the stem cell colonies of normal mice also revealed homologous and nonhomologous expression of the cell lineages. Comparison of lineage expression in colonies derived from single progenitors with the sum of lineages expressed in pairs of colonies derived from single progenitors indicated that the diversity was not due to injury inflicted by micromanipulation. These observations provide experimental data in support of stochastic mechanisms of stem cell differentiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6585813      PMCID: PMC345094          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.81.8.2520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  12 in total

1.  A STOCHASTIC MODEL OF STEM CELL PROLIFERATION, BASED ON THE GROWTH OF SPLEEN COLONY-FORMING CELLS.

Authors:  J E TILL; E A MCCULLOCH; L SIMINOVITCH
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Competition between erythropoietin and colony-stimulating factor for target cells in mouse marrow.

Authors:  G Van Zant; E Goldwasser
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Cholinesterase as a possible marker for early cells of the megakaryocytic series.

Authors:  C W Jackson
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Erythroid colony formation in cultures of mouse and human bone marrow: analysis of the requirement for erythropoietin by gel filtration and affinity chromatography on agarose-concanavalin A.

Authors:  N N Iscove; F Sieber; K H Winterhalter
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 6.384

5.  Investigations of a stochastic model of haemopoiesis.

Authors:  A P Korn; R M Henkelman; F P Ottensmeyer; J E Till
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 6.  Renewal and commitment to differentiation of hemopoietic stem cells (an interpretive review).

Authors:  M Ogawa; P N Porter; T Nakahata
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  The production of committed hemopoietic colony-forming cells from multipotential precursor cells in vitro.

Authors:  N A Nicola; G R Johnson
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  A stochastic model of self-renewal and commitment to differentiation of the primitive hemopoietic stem cells in culture.

Authors:  T Nakahata; A J Gross; M Ogawa
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 6.384

9.  Identification in culture of a class of hemopoietic colony-forming units with extensive capability to self-renew and generate multipotential hemopoietic colonies.

Authors:  T Nakahata; M Ogawa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Clonal origin of murine hemopoietic colonies with apparent restriction to granuclocyte-macrophage-megakaryocyte (GMM) differentiation.

Authors:  T Nakahata; M Ogawa
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 6.384

View more
  62 in total

1.  A single peripheral CD8+ T cell can give rise to progeny expressing type 1 and/or type 2 cytokine genes and can retain its multipotentiality through many cell divisions.

Authors:  A Kelso; P Groves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Myeloerythroid-restricted progenitors are sufficient to confer radioprotection and provide the majority of day 8 CFU-S.

Authors:  Thanyaphong Na Nakorn; David Traver; Irving L Weissman; Koichi Akashi
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 3.  The stem cell continuum: considerations on the heterogeneity and plasticity of marrow stem cells.

Authors:  Peter J Quesenberry; G Dooner; M Dooner; G Colvin
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 4.  Asymmetry of stem cell fate and the potential impact of the niche: observations, simulations, and interpretations.

Authors:  Ingo Roeder; Ronny Lorenz
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.739

5.  Imaging hematopoietic precursor division in real time.

Authors:  Mingfu Wu; Hyog Young Kwon; Frederique Rattis; Jordan Blum; Chen Zhao; Rina Ashkenazi; Trachette L Jackson; Nicholas Gaiano; Tim Oliver; Tannishtha Reya
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 24.633

6.  Towards predictive models of stem cell fate.

Authors:  Sowmya Viswanathan; Peter W Zandstra
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.058

7.  Heterogeneity of sister cell fates.

Authors:  Timm Schroeder
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 8.  Metabolic requirements for the maintenance of self-renewing stem cells.

Authors:  Keisuke Ito; Toshio Suda
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 94.444

9.  An efficient method for single hematopoietic stem cell engraftment in mice based on cell-cycle dormancy of hematopoietic stem cells.

Authors:  Takanori Abe; Masahiro Masuya; Makio Ogawa
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 10.  The paradoxical dynamism of marrow stem cells: considerations of stem cells, niches, and microvesicles.

Authors:  Peter J Quesenberry; Jason M Aliotta
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 5.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.