Literature DB >> 6584561

Randomized phase II trial of carminomycin versus 4'-epidoxorubicin in advanced breast cancer.

M Rozencweig, W ten Bokkel Huinink, F Cavalli, U Bruntsch, P Dombernowsky, H Høst, V Bramwell, G Renard, M Van Glabbeke, G Decoster.   

Abstract

Sixty-three evaluable patients with advanced breast cancer were randomly allocated to receive three-week intravenous courses of carminomycin (18 mg/m2) or 4'-epidoxorubicin (90 mg/m2). The former yielded one (3%) partial response for nine weeks among 29 patients whereas, in the other arm, nine (27%) of 34 patients achieved partial response for a median of 28 weeks (range, nine to 36 weeks; p less than 0.02). The major toxic effect of these anthracyclines was leukopenia with median white blood cell nadirs of 1,600/microL (range, 300-4,000/microL) versus 1,800/microL (range, 500-4,300/microL), respectively. Acute nonhematologic toxic effects were qualitatively similar but carminomycin produced significantly less gastrointestinal intolerance and alopecia. Patients whose disease failed to respond to first-line anthracycline received doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) every three weeks. Four partial responses were obtained among 19 patients previously treated with carminomycin. Following 4'-epidoxorubicin therapy, one of 12 evaluable patients also attained partial response. Survival curves were not affected by the initial treatment option. Carminomycin has marginal activity against breast cancer whereas 4'-epidoxorubicin deserves further evaluation of its therapeutic index relative to doxorubicin. The design used in this trial appears attractive for prompt phase II evaluation of anthracycline analogs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6584561     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1984.2.4.275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  7 in total

Review 1.  Rechallenging with anthracyclines and taxanes in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Carlo Palmieri; Jonathan Krell; Colin R James; Catherine Harper-Wynne; Vivek Misra; Susan Cleator; David Miles
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Anthracycline analogs: the past, present, and future.

Authors:  R B Weiss; G Sarosy; K Clagett-Carr; M Russo; B Leyland-Jones
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 3.  Epirubicin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  G L Plosker; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Phase II study of carminomycin in a human tumor cloning assay.

Authors:  M Rozencweig; C Sanders; W Rombaut; N Crespeigne; G Decoster; Y Kenis; J Klastersky
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  Doxorubicin vs epirubicin, report of a second-line randomized phase II/III study in advanced breast cancer. EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group.

Authors:  M Bontenbal; M Andersson; J Wildiers; G Cocconi; J Jassem; R Paridaens; N Rotmensz; R Sylvester; H T Mouridsen; J G Klijn; A T van Oosterom
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  A phase II study of high dose epirubicin in unresectable non small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  E F Smit; H H Berendsen; D A Piers; J Smeets; A Riva; P E Postmus
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  A phase I dose-escalating study of DaunoXome, liposomal daunorubicin, in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  K J O'Byrne; A L Thomas; R A Sharma; M DeCatris; F Shields; S Beare; W P Steward
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.