Literature DB >> 6581222

Clinical evaluation of periodontal ligament anesthesia using a pressure syringe.

G N Smith, R E Walton, B J Abbott.   

Abstract

Conventional local anesthesia techniques are frequently unsuccessful, particularly for endodontic procedures. Supplementary injections are often necessary; the periodontal ligament injection is useful for this purpose. This study examined the effectiveness of injecting into the periodontal ligament with a pistol-type pressure syringe as a supplemental technique in patients who did not have adequate anesthesia for endodontic therapy. Sixty patients received the supplemental injections and 20 patients were reinjected when the first PDL injection failed. Data were obtained by questionnaire. Percentages were computed and comparisons made by X2 analysis. The conclusions about attaining anesthesia included: --Needle size was not important; overall, 25- and 30-gauge needles were equivalent. --Injecting under strong back-pressure was important; the greatest frequency of success was attained when injecting under pressure. Lack of back-pressure on both mesial and distal surfaces resulted in a significantly lower incidence of anesthesia. Proper positioning of the needle and maintaining this position, to force the anesthetic deep into the periodontium, is apparently an effective way to generate the needed back-pressure. --Strong back-pressure could usually be attained on either or both surfaces. --Reinjection was frequently successful if the first periodontal ligament injection failed. --Overall frequency of success in attaining anesthesia with the pistol-type pressure syringe was 83%. This was determined by including the instances in which reinjection was necessary. --Comparing the results of this study with a previous similar study, the pressure syringe were equally effective for supplementary anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6581222     DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1983.0357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8177            Impact factor:   3.634


  7 in total

Review 1.  Effective anaesthesia of the acutely inflamed pulp: part 2. Clinical strategies.

Authors:  S S Virdee; S Bhakta; D Seymour
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Comparison of injection pain, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.

Authors:  John Nusstein; Jeffrey Berlin; Al Reader; Mike Beck; Joel M Weaver
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2004

3.  Local anesthetics: a century of progress.

Authors:  J A Yagiela
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr

4.  A comparison of the periodontal ligament injection using 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and saline in human mandibular premolars.

Authors:  K D Moore; A Reader; W J Meyers; M Beck; J Weaver
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct

5.  A comparison of periodontal intraligamental anesthesia using etidocaine HCl and lidocaine HCl.

Authors:  G K Johnson; G L Hlava; K L Kalkwarf
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1985 Sep-Oct

6.  Anesthetic efficacy of supplemental buccal infiltration versus intraligamentary injection in mandibular first and second molars with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Nazanin Zargar; Shiva Shojaeian; Mohammadreza Vatankhah; Shirin Heidaryan; Hengameh Ashraf; Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban; Omid Dianat
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2022-09-27

7.  Pain-related Disruptive Behavior during Dental Treatment Interpreted as Uncooperative Behavior-Small Case Series.

Authors:  Ashkenazi Malka; Gotler Maya
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.