Literature DB >> 6579841

Principles of orthodontic mechanics in orthognathic surgery cases.

J D Jacobs, P M Sinclair.   

Abstract

In orthognathic surgery cases the treatment objectives, extraction patterns, and types of mechanics used are frequently the reverse of those used in conventional orthodontics. Thus, starting cases orthodontically and then, if unsuccessful, referring them for surgery often produces compromised results. Presurgical intra-arch objectives include positioning of the incisors in "ideal" positions, establishment of correct torque, and elimination of tooth-size discrepancies so as to permit the establishment of Class I canine and molar relationships after surgery. Presurgical objectives in the sagittal plane focus on removal of dental compensations. This may require the use of Class III elastics in Class II cases (and vice versa), thus allowing for maximal surgical correction of the underlying skeletal deformity. In the transverse plane, differentiation of skeletal from dental problems as well as identification of relative and absolute discrepancies should be carried out presurgically. Lateral corticotomies or segmental maxillary procedures should be used, depending on individual circumstances. Presurgical objectives in the vertical plane include maximizing the amount of presurgical orthodontic treatment carried out in open bites and minimizing the presurgical mechanics in deep bites. Encouragement of opening mandibular rotation at surgery while avoiding an increase in posterior face height contributes to stability. Orthodontic mechanics should not always include presurgical leveling of the curve of Spee and should actively avoid movements that may cause relapse tendencies. Careful attention to the use of surgical arch wires and splints during surgery and fixation, along with controlled elastic therapy and exercise programs after fixation, can greatly facilitate treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6579841     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(93)90003-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  11 in total

1.  Segmental LeFort I osteotomy for treatment of a Class III malocclusion with temporomandibular disorder.

Authors:  Marcos Janson; Guilherme Janson; Eduardo Sant'Ana; Alexandre Nakamura; Marcos Roberto de Freitas
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  Postsurgical Orthodontic Treatment Planning: a Case Report with 20 Years Follow-up.

Authors:  Giampietro Farronato; Umberto Garagiola; Vera Carletti; Paolo Cressoni; Carmen Mortellaro
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2011-07-01

3.  Nahoum Index in Brachyfacial Patients: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Chiara Vompi; Roberto Vernucci; Ambra Maria Costantini; Valentina Mazzoli; Gabriella Galluccio; Alessandro Silvestri
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-05-20

4.  How much incisor decompensation is achieved prior to orthognathic surgery?

Authors:  Calum McNeil; Grant T McIntyre; Sean Laverick
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2014-07-01

5.  The impact of surgery-first approach on the oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xinqi Huang; Xiao Cen; Wentian Sun; Kai Xia; Liyuan Yu; Jun Liu; Zhihe Zhao
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Three-dimensional analysis of dental decompensation for skeletal Class III malocclusion on the basis of vertical skeletal patterns obtained using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Yong-Il Kim; Youn-Kyung Choi; Soo-Byung Park; Woo-Sung Son; Seong-Sik Kim
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 1.372

7.  Comparison of changes in the transverse dental axis between patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry treated by orthognathic surgery with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Han-Sol Song; Sung-Hwan Choi; Jung-Yul Cha; Kee-Joon Lee; Hyung-Seog Yu
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  Comparative study of postoperative stability between conventional orthognathic surgery and a surgery-first orthognathic approach after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for skeletal class III correction.

Authors:  Deuk-Hyun Mah; Su-Gwan Kim; Ji-Su Oh; Jae-Seek You; Seo-Yun Jung; Won-Gi Kim; Kyung-Hwan Yu
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-02-20

Review 9.  Concepts, protocol, variations and current trends in surgery first orthognathic approach: a literature review.

Authors:  Hafiz Taha Mahmood; Maheen Ahmed; Mubassar Fida; Adeel Tahir Kamal; Farheen Fatima
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2018 May-Jun

10.  Positional changes in the mandibular proximal segment after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: Surgery-first approach versus conventional approach.

Authors:  Seoyeon Jung; Yunjin Choi; Jung-Hyun Park; Young-Soo Jung; Hyoung-Seon Baik
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 1.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.