Literature DB >> 6577795

Unilateral craniofacial microsomia. Part I. Mandibular analysis.

B H Grayson, S Boral, S Eisig, A Kolber, J G McCarthy.   

Abstract

Various attempts to describe the skeletal characteristics of unilateral craniofacial microsomia have been made with the use of cephalometric and panoramic roentgenograms. Previous studies have been only descriptive in nature. To date, a detailed (quantitative) cephalometric analysis of the mandibular deformity has not been reported. The purpose of this study was to describe the skeletal jaw deformity by means of cephalometric landmarks in the lateral view. The patient population consisted of sixteen boys and eight girls who ranged in age from 6 to 16 years. They were compared to the University of Michigan normal control population for the following measures: gonial angle, mandibular plane angle, overall oblique length of the mandible, ramal height, and body length. The affected side showed a larger gonial angle and mandibular plane angle. The oblique length of the mandible (Cd-Gn) was decreased on both sides, as were ramal height and body length. Paradoxically, body length appeared shorter on the unaffected side than on the affected side. This paradoxical observation could be attributed to a shift of the mandible in relation to the midsagittal plane of the cranial base, the film cassette, and the path of the x-ray beam. Observation of the mandible in the basilar cephalogram explained the geometry of the projection error found in the lateral view. Similar projection errors exist for patients with other types of craniofacial asymmetry. It is suggested that two radiographic views, orthogonal to each other, should be used to define the x, y, and z planes for studies of craniofacial abnormality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6577795     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(83)90130-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  5 in total

Review 1.  Craniofacial malformations and the orthodontist.

Authors:  A Akram; M M McKnight; H Bellardie; V Beale; R D Evans
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Change of lip and occlusal cant after simultaneous maxillary and mandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia.

Authors:  S M Balaji
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-01-25

Review 3.  Hemifacial microsomia: extraoral appliance for the early treatment of an infant. Literature review and case report.

Authors:  L Gripp; W Hüsgen; H G Luhr; H A Merten; G Wiese
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Sulfotransferase Ndst1 is needed for mandibular and TMJ development.

Authors:  T Yasuda; C Mundy; T Kinumatsu; Y Shibukawa; T Shibutani; K Grobe; N Minugh-Purvis; M Pacifici; E Koyama
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 6.116

5.  Three-dimensional functional unit analysis of hemifacial microsomia mandible-a preliminary report.

Authors:  Ji Wook Choi; Byung Hoon Kim; Hyung Soo Kim; Tae Hoon Yu; Bong Chul Kim; Sang-Hwy Lee
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-09-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.