Surgical orthodontics and the temporomandibular joint. I. Superior repositioning of the maxilla.

Ten randomly selected adults who had undergone orthodontic treatment and isolated superior repositioning of the maxilla for vertical maxillary excess (VME) were evaluated clinically and radiographically (mean, 48.7 months postsurgery) for signs and symptoms of masticatory and temporomandibular joint dysfunction. The patients ranged from 18 years to 37 years of age (mean, 26.2 years) when evaluated. A three-part evaluation of the subjects was performed. This consisted of an anamnestic evaluation (previous medical history), a clinical examination, and a radiographic evaluation. The anamnestic evaluation revealed that, prior to surgery, facial pain was reported by one patient and was not present in any of the patients upon follow-up examination. We believed that the pain was not related to the masticatory musculature and/or the temporomandibular joint. No patients reported pain or sounds in their joints preoperatively, while 30 percent (3/10) of the patients related a history of temporomandibular joint sounds immediately after release of intermaxillary fixation, which subsequently was reported to have resolved in all instances without treatment. Clinical examination of the temporomandibular joints at the time of recall evaluated mandibular movements and the presence of pain or sounds during joint function. These examinations revealed that clinical measures of mandibular movements were somewhat reduced relative to normal. All patients were free of temporomandibular joint and masticatory muscle pain during function, upon contralateral masticatory loading, and upon palpation. Fifteen percent (3/20) of the joints examined demonstrated sounds (popping or crepitation) via auscultation. Masticatory loading in the contralateral premolar region did not induce noise in any of the joints examined. Cephalometric laminagraphic radiographs were obtained of each of the twenty temporomandibular joints with the mandible in three positions; maximum intercuspation, mandibular rest position, and maximal opening. Numerous anatomic relations were quantified from these radiographs. However, only three parameters (condylar position, movement, and evidence of arthrosis) were compared to normative data available in the literature. These comparative data suggested that persons who had undergone orthodontic treatment in conjunction with superior maxillary repositioning demonstrated (1) a relatively retropositional condyle within the fossa and (2) reduced condylar movement during maximal mandibular opening. Two of twenty temporomandibular joints demonstrated radiographic evidence of arthrosis; one condyle demonstrated articular surface erosions, and another exhibited articular surface sclerosis. The overall incidence of arthrosis was not much greater than normal, with 20 percent (4/20) of the joints demonstrating a reduced interarticular joint space. Overall, the clinical findings revealed a low incidence of pathologic masticatory muscle and temporomandibular joint symptoms and signs compared to normative data in the literature...