Literature DB >> 6573373

Occlusal forces in normal- and long-face adults.

W R Proffit, H W Fields, W L Nixon.   

Abstract

Using both quartz- and foil-based piezo-electric force transducers, occlusal forces during swallow, simulated chewing, and maximum effort were evaluated in 19 long-face and 21 normal individuals. Forces were measured at 2.5 mm and 6.0 mm molar separation. Long-face individuals have significantly less occlusal force during maximum effort, simulated chewing, and swallowing than do individuals with normal vertical facial dimensions. No differences in forces between 2.5- and 6.0-mm jaw separation were observed for either group.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6573373     DOI: 10.1177/00220345830620051201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  48 in total

1.  The arrangement of the interproximal interfaces in the human permanent dentition.

Authors:  Rachel Sarig; Nikolaos V Lianopoulos; Israel Hershkovitz; Alexander D Vardimon
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Fiber-type differences in masseter muscle associated with different facial morphologies.

Authors:  Anthea Rowlerson; Gwénaël Raoul; Yousif Daniel; John Close; Claude-Alain Maurage; Joel Ferri; James J Sciote
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 3.  Malocclusion, mastication and the gastrointestinal system: a review.

Authors:  Peter Proff
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Occlusal function associated with body composition in premenopausal Japanese women.

Authors:  S Hara; H Yanagi; H Amagai; S Tomura
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.674

5.  Comparative evaluation of maximum bite force in dentulous and edentulous individuals with different facial forms.

Authors:  Gaurav Tripathi; Ponnanna A A; Nishant Rajwadha; Nidhi Chhaparia; Abhishek Sharma; Mahendra Anant
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-09-20

6.  Transverse dentoalveolar response of mandibular arch after rapid maxillary expansion (RME) with tooth-borne and bone-borne appliances.

Authors:  Antonino Lo Giudice; Vincenzo Ronsivalle; Manuel Lagravere; Rosalia Leonardi; Stefano Martina; Gaetano Isola
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Low-Profile Electromagnetic Field Sensors in the Measurement and Modelling of Three-Dimensional Jaw Kinematics and Occlusal Loading.

Authors:  Sarah C Woodford; Dale L Robinson; Cornelia Edelmann; Albert Mehl; Oliver Röhrle; Peter Vee Sin Lee; David C Ackland
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 8.  Bite Force Recording Devices - A Review.

Authors:  Tarun Prakash Verma; Kanteshwari Iranagouda Kumathalli; Vinay Jain; Rajesh Kumar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-09-01

9.  [Facial morphology and the size and activity of the masseter muscle].

Authors:  S Ruf; H Pancherz; M Kirschbaum
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1994-10

10.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the deformation of the human mandible: a preliminary study from the perspective of orthodontic mini-implant stability.

Authors:  Sun-Hye Baek; Hyun-Suk Cha; Jung-Yul Cha; Yoon-Shik Moon; Sang-Jin Sung
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 1.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.