Literature DB >> 6549200

Initial Iowa results with the multichannel cochlear implant from Melbourne.

R S Tyler, M W Lowder, S R Otto, J P Preece, B J Gantz, B F McCabe.   

Abstract

Two subjects who use the Melbourne multichannel cochlear implant were studied. Live-voice word, consonant, and vowel recognition tests, and a speech-tracking task were administered at regular intervals during the first 90 days after implantation. Results indicated 30-50% correct recognition of vowels (given 9 alternatives) and about 30-60% correct recognition of consonants (given 12 alternatives). Speech tracking showed from two to three times faster rates with the implant and vision compared to a vision-alone condition. After 3-4 months of implant experience, a number of recorded tests from the Minimal Auditory Capabilities battery and the Iowa Cochlear-Implant tests were then administered. These results indicated about 80% recognition of everyday sounds in a five-choice closed-set condition and about 50% recognition of everyday sounds in an open-set condition. The subjects were 50% correct at identifying the accented words in a sentence and about 50% correct at determining the number of syllables in a word. One subject was unable to recognize a sentence as a statement or a question. Background noise (+10 dB S/N) reduced their performance on a four-choice spondee test to chance. Both subjects were able to identify a sound as either a voice or a modulated noise at 95% correct, and both could recognize speaker sex at 95% correct. Neither could discriminate whether two (successive) sentences were spoken by the same speaker or by two different speakers. Remarkably, one subject identified 45% and the other 85% of the words in sentences that were preceded by a contextual picture using sound alone. One subject identified 13% of the words in sentences in sound alone even without contextual information.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6549200     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2704.596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  3 in total

1.  Some considerations in evaluating spoken word recognition by normal-hearing, noise-masked normal-hearing, and cochlear implant listeners. I: The effects of response format.

Authors:  M S Sommers; K I Kirk; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Validation of the Iowa Test of Consonant Perception.

Authors:  Jason Geller; Ann Holmes; Adam Schwalje; Joel I Berger; Phillip E Gander; Inyong Choi; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.482

Review 3.  Conversations in Cochlear Implantation: The Inner Ear Therapy of Today.

Authors:  Grant Rauterkus; Anne K Maxwell; Jacob B Kahane; Jennifer J Lentz; Moises A Arriaga
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-04-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.