Literature DB >> 6548291

[3H]Pirenzepine and [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate binding to brain muscarinic cholinergic receptors. Differences in measured receptor density are not explained by differences in receptor isomerization.

G R Luthin, B B Wolfe.   

Abstract

Muscarinic receptor densities were measured in membranes prepared from rat cerebral cortex using [3H]pirenzepine and [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate. Isotherms of equilibrium binding data modeled to a single apparent binding site for both ligands. However, as has been reported previously, [3H]pirenzepine labeled only a small fraction of the binding sites that were labeled by [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate. This observation has been used to support the hypothesis that subtypes of muscarinic receptors exist. Several investigators have previously suggested that antagonist binding to muscarinic receptors involves an isomerization of the receptor-antagonist complex, and it is only the isomerized form of the receptor that is identified by radioligand binding studies. To examine the possibility that the difference in the density of binding sites identified by [3H]pirenzepine and [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate is due to differences in the degree of isomerization of the receptor associated with the binding of each ligand, the kinetics of the binding of [3H]pirenzepine and [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate to membranes prepared from rat cerebral cortex were examined. The pseudo-first-order rate constant of association for both ligands showed a nonlinear (hyperbolic) dependence on ligand concentration. These results suggested that a rapidly equilibrating initial binding step was followed by a more slowly equilibrating isomerization of the initially formed ligand-receptor complex. The kinetic data were computer-modeled to obtain estimates of the equilibrium constants for both reaction steps. The equilibrium constants for the isomerization step were 0.1 and 0.004 for [3H]pirenzepine and [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate, respectively. Our measurements, in agreement with others, suggested that only the fraction of receptors which isomerized were measurable using filtration binding assays. Although essentially all (99.6%) of the [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate binding sites appeared to isomerize, only 90% of the [3H]pirenzepine binding sites isomerized, and thus only 90% were measured in our assay. It therefore appears that differences in receptor isomerization can partially, but not wholly, account for the differences between [3H]pirenzepine and [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate binding in rat cerebral cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6548291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0026-895X            Impact factor:   4.436


  6 in total

1.  Pharmacological characterization of N1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-N4-hexylpiperazine as a multi-target antagonist of α1A/α1D-adrenoceptors and 5-HT1A receptors that blocks prostate contraction and cell growth.

Authors:  Fernanda Chagas-Silva; Jéssica Barbosa Nascimento-Viana; Luiz Antonio S Romeiro; Luana C Barberato; François Noël; Claudia Lucia Martins Silva
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Antimuscarinic effects of (R)- and (S)- oxyphencyclimine hydrochloride.

Authors:  L Schjelderup; M R Kozlowski; A Weissman; A J Aasen
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Pirenzepine promotes the dimerization of muscarinic M1 receptors through a three-step binding process.

Authors:  Brigitte Ilien; Nicole Glasser; Jean-Pierre Clamme; Pascal Didier; Etienne Piemont; Raja Chinnappan; Sandrine B Daval; Jean-Luc Galzi; Yves Mely
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Asymmetric distribution and down-regulation of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor in rat cerebral cortex.

Authors:  M F Pediconi; A M Roccamo de Fernández; F J Barrantes
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 5.  Pirenzepine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in peptic ulcer disease and other allied diseases.

Authors:  A A Carmine; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Two affinity states of M1 muscarine receptors.

Authors:  L T Potter; C A Ferrendelli; H E Hanchett
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 5.046

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.