Literature DB >> 6547734

Speech processing studies using an acoustic model of a multiple-channel cochlear implant.

P J Blamey, R C Dowell, Y C Tong, A M Brown, S M Luscombe, G M Clark.   

Abstract

The speech perception of two multiple-channel cochlear implant patients was compared with that of three normally hearing listeners using an acoustic model of the implant for 22 different speech tests. The tests used included a minimal auditory capabilities battery, both closed-set and open-set word and sentence tests, speech tracking and a 12-consonant confusion study using nonsense syllables. The acoustic model represented electrical current pulses by bursts of noise and the effects of different electrodes were represented by using bandpass filters with different center frequencies. All subjects used a speech processor that coded the fundamental voicing frequency of speech as a pulse rate and the second formant frequency of speech as the electrode position in the cochlea, or the center frequency of the bandpass filter. Very good agreement was found for the two groups of subjects, indicating that the acoustic model is a useful tool for the development and evaluation of alternative cochlear implant speech processing strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6547734     DOI: 10.1121/1.391104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

1.  VALIDATION OF ACOUSTIC MODELS OF AUDITORY NEURAL PROSTHESES.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Nai Ding; Elad Sagi; Chin-Tuan Tan; Matthew Fitzgerald; E Katelyn Glassman; Keena Seward; Arlene C Neuman
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Conf Acoust Speech Signal Process       Date:  2013-05

2.  The effects of Lombard perturbation on speech intelligibility in noise for normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Juliana N Saba; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.482

3.  Mandarin Chinese tone identification in cochlear implants: predictions from acoustic models.

Authors:  Kenneth D Morton; Peter A Torrione; Chandra S Throckmorton; Leslie M Collins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Fundamental frequency and speech intelligibility in background noise.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Formant priority channel selection for an "n-of-m" sound processing strategy for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Juliana N Saba; Hussnain Ali; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.482

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.