Literature DB >> 6542427

Refractoriness to inductive day lengths terminates the breeding season of the Suffolk ewe.

J E Robinson, F J Karsch.   

Abstract

The ambient photoperiod was recorded over an 8-yr period at the beginning and end of the breeding season in a flock of Suffolk ewes maintained outdoors. The transition into the breeding season in this short-day breeder occurred at a day length which was much longer (14.0 h, Sept. 3 +/- 5 days) than that at the onset of anestrus (11.5 h, Feb. 15 +/- 3 days). This produced a marked asymmetry of the annual cycles of photoperiod and reproduction. In an attempt to explain this asymmetry, we determined if ewes enter anestrus because increasing day lengths curtail breeding or because ewes lose the ability to respond to prevailing short day lengths (i.e., become photorefractory). On the winter solstice, 3 groups of 6 ovariectomized ewes bearing s.c. Silastic implants of estradiol were placed on different day length treatments: 1) natural environment; 2) artificial day length which simulated natural photoperiod; or 3) artificial day length equivalent to that of the winter solstice (10L). Transition into anestrus was determined from the precipitous drop in serum luteininzing hormone (LH) concentrations. The breeding season was not prolonged in ewes held on the winter solstice day length; LH did not remain elevated beyond the time that it plummeted in the other groups. These findings lead to the conclusion that Suffolk ewes normally cease breeding, not because they are actively inhibited by increasing day lengths, but because they become photorefractory. This can account, at least in part, for the asymmetry between the annual cycle of photoperiod and reproduction in this short-day breeder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6542427     DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod31.4.656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Reprod        ISSN: 0006-3363            Impact factor:   4.285


  7 in total

Review 1.  Influence of melatonin and photoperiod on animal and human reproduction.

Authors:  A Cagnacci; A Volpe
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 2.  Neural mechanisms controlling seasonal reproduction: principles derived from the sheep model and its comparison with hamsters.

Authors:  Peyton W Weems; Robert L Goodman; Michael N Lehman
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 8.606

3.  Circadian rhythms in the mouse reproductive axis during the estrous cycle and pregnancy.

Authors:  Alexandra M Yaw; Thu V Duong; Duong Nguyen; Hanne M Hoffmann
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 4.  Influence of photoperiod on hormones, behavior, and immune function.

Authors:  James C Walton; Zachary M Weil; Randy J Nelson
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 8.606

5.  Photoperiodic requirements for timing onset and duration of the breeding season of the ewe: synchronization of an endogenous rhythm of reproduction.

Authors:  N L Wayne; B Malpaux; F J Karsch
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Annual rhythms of milk and milk fat and protein production in dairy cattle in the United States.

Authors:  I J Salfer; C D Dechow; K J Harvatine
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 7.  Mammalian pineal melatonin: a clock for all seasons.

Authors:  T J Bartness; B D Goldman
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1989-10-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.