Literature DB >> 6536479

Attitudes of physicians, pharmacists, and laypersons toward seriousness and need for disclosure of prescription drug side effects.

C Keown, P Slovic, S Lichtenstein.   

Abstract

How much information should be provided to patients about prescription drug side effects? What determines the perceived seriousness of a drug side effect and how does seriousness relate to the need to inform patients about that effect? This study explored these questions in a survey of laypersons, physicians, and pharmacists. The results indicated that pain, effect on one's ability to carry out everyday activities, and threat to life were the key determinants of a side-effect's seriousness. Laypeople tended to judge most side effects as more serious than did pharmacists and physicians. Whereas the health professionals tended to want minor side effects listed only if they occur quite frequently, laypeople tended to want all potential effects listed, no matter how rarely they occur or how minor they are. The practical and political implications of these findings are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6536479     DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.3.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  2 in total

Review 1.  The role and value of written information for patients about individual medicines: a systematic review.

Authors:  Janet Grime; Alison Blenkinsopp; David K Raynor; Kristian Pollock; Peter Knapp
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  'It's the best of two evils': a study of patients' perceived information needs about oral steroids for asthma.

Authors:  Fiona A. Stevenson; Gwen Wallace; Peter Rivers; David Gerrett
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.377

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.