Literature DB >> 653482

The alternative to colostomy for the injured colon.

J V Robbs.   

Abstract

In 34 patients with penetrating colon wounds which were considered to be liable to dehiscence, the sutured wounds were exteriorized. There were several 'high-risk' factors, i.e. operative delay of more than 6 hours after injury, faecal contamination of the peritoneal cavity, marked contusion of the bowel wall, and severe associated visceral haematoma which is deemed liable to infection. Additional considerations were thoraco-abdominal penetration and combined colonic and renal injuries. The operative technique is described in detail, and the morbidity of the procedure, which is low, is analysed. Comparison is made with a similar group of patients in whom colostomy was performed with subsequent closure. Exteriorization and closure of the penetrating colon wound appear significantly superior to colostomy in terms of mortality, septic complications and period of hospitalization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 653482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  S Afr Med J


  2 in total

1.  Management of perforating colon trauma: randomization between primary closure and exteriorization.

Authors:  H H Stone; T C Fabian
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  The impact of mechanism on the management and outcome of penetrating colonic trauma.

Authors:  G V Oosthuizen; V Y Kong; T Estherhuizen; J L Bruce; G L Laing; J J Odendaal; D L Clarke
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 1.891

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.