Literature DB >> 6527546

Some thoughts on the evolutionary basis for the prominent role of ATP and ADP in cellular energy metabolism.

J E Wilson.   

Abstract

The predominance of the adenosine triphosphate/adenosine diphosphate (ATP/ADP) couple in cellular phosphorylation reactions, including those that form the basis for cellular energy metabolism, cannot be explained on thermodynamic grounds since a variety of "high energy phosphate" compounds (including ADP itself) found in the cell would, based on thermodynamic considerations, be at least as effective as ATP in serving as a phosphoryl donor. How then did present-day organisms come to rely on the ATP/ADP couple as the principal mediator of phosphorylation reactions? The early appearance of adenine compounds in the prebiotic environment is suggested by experiments indicating that, relative to other purine or pyridimine compounds, adenine derivatives are preferentially synthesized under simulated prebiotic conditions (Ponnamperuma et al., 1963). In addition to the roles of adenine nucleotides in phosphorylation reactions, other adenine derivatives (e.g. Coenzyme A, flavin adenine dinucleotide, puridine nucleotides) are employed in a variety of metabolic roles. The principal function of the adenine moiety in these latter cases is in the binding of these derivatives to the relevant enzyme. The capability for binding of the adenine moiety appears to have arisen early in evolution and been exploited in a multitude of contexts, a suggestion consistent with observed similarities between the binding sites of several enzymes employing adenine derivatives as substrate. The early availability of suitable adenine compounds in the biosphere and development of complementary binding sites on cellular proteins, coupled with the expected advantages in having a limited number of metabolites as central mediators of endergonic and exergonic metabolism could readily have led to the observed pre-eminence of adenine nucleotides in cellular energy metabolism.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6527546     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5193(84)80257-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  3 in total

Review 1.  Long-term (trophic) purinergic signalling: purinoceptors control cell proliferation, differentiation and death.

Authors:  G Burnstock; A Verkhratsky
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 8.469

2.  Efficient incorporation of CoA, NAD and FAD into RNA by in vitro transcription.

Authors:  Faqing Huang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Insights into how nucleotide supplements enhance the peroxidase-mimicking DNAzyme activity of the G-quadruplex/hemin system.

Authors:  Loic Stefan; Franck Denat; David Monchaud
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 16.971

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.