Literature DB >> 6523859

Some obstacles to the evaluation and effective performance of health appraisals.

G D Friedman.   

Abstract

Certain obstacles exist in evaluating screening tests and health examinations. When a voluntarily screened group is compared with an unscreened group and when the survival of cases detected in these two groups is compared, self-selection bias, lead-time bias, length bias and overdiagnosis confuse the evaluation and usually make an examination seem better than it really is. A randomized controlled trial overcomes these biases; one group is offered screening, the other is not and the outcomes in both entire groups are observed. Unavoidable crossovers between the groups tend to obscure any benefit of the examination, however. Evaluations of screening tests have tended to emphasize the value of positive results and have neglected the value of negative results. In obtaining maximum benefit from health appraisals, attention needs to be directed at self-selection, nonmedical threats to life and health, risk factors in addition to early disease and tailoring an examination to the needs of individual patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6523859      PMCID: PMC1011211     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  8 in total

Review 1.  A critical review of periodic health screening using specific screening criteria. 3. Selected diseases of the genitourinary system.

Authors:  P S Frame; S J Carlson
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  Evaluating periodic multiphasic health checkups: a controlled trial.

Authors:  L G Dales; G D Friedman; M F Collen
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1979

3.  Evidence on screening for breast cancer from a randomized trial.

Authors:  S Shapiro
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  The management of dysplasia, carcinoma in situ and microcarcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  M Brudenell; B S Cox; C W Taylor
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw       Date:  1973-08

5.  Multiphasic health testing and medical care as a right.

Authors:  S R Garfield
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1970-11-12       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Commission on chronic illness follow-up study. Comparison of screened and nonscreened individuals.

Authors:  L Kuller; S Tonascia
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1970-11

7.  The lifetime health-monitoring program. A practical approach to preventive medicine.

Authors:  L Breslow; A R Somers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-03-17       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Reinstitution of allopurinol therapy for gouty arthritis after cutaneous reactions.

Authors:  A G Fam; T W Paton; A Chaiton
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1980-07-19       Impact factor: 8.262

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.