Literature DB >> 6520307

NoSo and NoS pi thresholds as a function of masker level for narrow-band and wideband masking noise.

J W Hall, A D Harvey.   

Abstract

NoSo and NoS pi thresholds for a 500-Hz signal were determined as a function of masker level for masking noises having 600- and 50-Hz bandwidths centered on 500 Hz. Noise levels of 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 dB/Hz were used for the 600-Hz bandwidth, and noise levels of 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, and 70 dB/Hz were used for the 50-Hz bandwidth. The So thresholds increased as a function of increasing noise level with a slope close to 1.0, for both the 50- and 600-Hz masker bandwidths. For the 600-Hz-wide masker, the S pi thresholds increased with a slope less than 1.0 for masker levels from 0 dB/Hz to approximately 20 dB/Hz, but increased with a slope close to 1.0 for masker levels above approximately 20 dB/Hz. For the 50-Hz-wide masker, the S pi thresholds increased with a slope less than 1.0 for masker levels from 0 dB/Hz to approximately 40 dB/Hz, but increased with a slope close to 1.0 for masker levels above approximately 40 dB/Hz. The results are discussed in terms of different binaural processes involving interaction between monaural critical bands centered on the signal frequency, and interaction involving monaural critical bands outside the monaural critical band centered on the signal. It was suggested that the narrow-band noise results are probably more appropriate than the wideband noise results when considering binaural interaction involving monaural critical bands centered on the signal frequency.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6520307     DOI: 10.1121/1.391616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  2 in total

1.  Effects of non-simultaneous masking on the binaural masking level difference.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall Iii
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Masking release by combined spatial and masker-fluctuation effects in the open sound field.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.840

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.