Literature DB >> 6517748

The Maryland CNC Test: normative studies.

G D Causey, L J Hood, C L Hermanson, L S Bowling.   

Abstract

These studies were conducted to determine the performance-intensity functions of the Maryland CNC Test (male voice) with normal-hearing and hearing-impaired persons, to examine the equivalence of the 10 lists, and to determine test-retest reliability. There was a 2.1% increase per decibel in word recognition in the linear portion of the performance-intensity function for normal listeners and a 1.3% increase per decibel for hearing-impaired listeners. 6 lists were judged to be equivalent, and there was good test-retest reliability. Hearing-impaired subjects demonstrated a wide range of scores on the Maryland CNC Test, suggesting that this measure can distinguish among varying degrees of word recognition ability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6517748     DOI: 10.3109/00206098409081538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiology        ISSN: 0020-6091


  11 in total

1.  Vocabulary Facilitates Speech Perception in Children With Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Kelsey E Klein; Elizabeth A Walker; Benjamin Kirby; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Can Preoperative CT Scans Be Used to Predict Facial Nerve Stimulation Following CI?

Authors:  Jonathan L Hatch; Habib G Rizk; Michael W Moore; Elizabeth E Camposeo; Shaun A Nguyen; Paul R Lambert; Ted A Meyer; Theodore R McRackan
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Human audiometric thresholds do not predict specific cellular damage in the inner ear.

Authors:  Lukas D Landegger; Demetri Psaltis; Konstantina M Stankovic
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Earphone and Aided Word Recognition Differences in Cochlear Implant Candidates.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Joshua E Fabie; Jane A Burton; Suqrat Munawar; Meredith A Holcomb; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Reducing Listening-Related Stress in School-Aged Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Gary Rance; Donella Chisari; Kerryn Saunders; Jean-Loup Rault
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2017-07

6.  Using Clinical Audiologic Measures to Determine Cochlear Implant Candidacy.

Authors:  Priyanka Reddy; James R Dornhoffer; Elizabeth L Camposeo; Judy R Dubno; Theodore R McRackan
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 2.213

Review 7.  Suggested response criteria for phase II antitumor drug studies for neurofibromatosis type 2 related vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  Scott R Plotkin; Chris Halpin; Jaishri O Blakeley; William H Slattery; D Bradley Welling; Susan M Chang; Jay S Loeffler; Gordon J Harris; A Gregory Sorensen; Michael J McKenna; Fred G Barker
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia.

Authors:  William B Cooper; Emily Tobey; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Factors Influencing Time to Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  James R Dornhoffer; Meredith A Holcomb; Ted A Meyer; Judy R Dubno; Theodore R McRackan
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.619

10.  Role of Preoperative Patient Expectations in Adult Cochlear Implant Outcomes.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Priyanka Reddy; Mark S Costello; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.