Literature DB >> 6517088

Two methods for estimating body surface area in adult amputees.

P M Colangelo, D W Welch, D S Rich, L P Jeffrey.   

Abstract

Two methods for estimating body surface area (BSA) in adult amputees were developed. BSA in sq m was determined in 42 healthy, nonamputee men and women by summing the surface areas of individual body parts obtained using geometric measurements (BSAmeas) and by an equation using height and weight (BSAcalc). Linear regression analysis was used to determine correlations between BSAmeas and BSAcalc and between BSAmeas and surface-area measurements of individual body parts (SApart). The percentages of total BSA contributed by individual body parts in each subject were determined by the ratio of SApart to BSAmeas, and these percentages were compared with the corresponding percentages for body parts using the "Rule of Nines." BSAcalc and BSAmeas were significantly correlated, as were SApart and BSAmeas. Regression analysis of SApart versus BSAmeas yielded an equation for each measured body part that allowed calculation of SApart without direct measurement. SApart expressed as a percentage of total BSA differed from the percentage of BSA used in the "Rule of Nines" by a mean of 12.4-32% depending on the body part. Two methods of estimating BSA in amputees were proposed based on deduction of the surface area of the amputated part (calculated from the regression equation for SApart or as a percentage of total BSA) from total BSAcalc in adult amputees. The two methods developed in this study for estimating BSA may be useful in determining drug dosages in adult amputees and may provide more accurate information in burn therapy. Further studies are needed to validate the clinical application of these methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6517088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm        ISSN: 0002-9289


  4 in total

1.  Optimal chemotherapy dosing in a bilateral lower extremities amputee with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Dwight Owen; Eileen M O'Reilly; Celina Ang; Jennifer Ma; Richard K G Do; Ghassan K Abou-Alfa
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2013-05

2.  The high-volume haemodiafiltration vs high-flux haemodialysis registry trial (H4RT): a multi-centre, unblinded, randomised, parallel-group, superiority study to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of high-volume haemodiafiltration and high-flux haemodialysis in people with kidney failure on maintenance dialysis using linkage to routine healthcare databases for outcomes.

Authors:  Fergus J Caskey; Sunita Procter; Stephanie J MacNeill; Julia Wade; Jodi Taylor; Leila Rooshenas; Yumeng Liu; Ammar Annaw; Karen Alloway; Andrew Davenport; Albert Power; Ken Farrington; Sandip Mitra; David C Wheeler; Kristian Law; Helen Lewis-White; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Will Hollingworth; Jenny Donovan; J Athene Lane
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 2.728

3.  Vancomycin and gentamicin pharmacokinetic alterations in an adolescent amputee.

Authors:  Kristen R Nichols; Kari M Edison; Michelle D Rosenbaum; Chad A Knoderer
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-01

4.  Thermoregulatory responses in persons with lower-limb amputation during upper-limb endurance exercise in a hot and humid environment.

Authors:  Kouki Fukuhara; Yukio Mikami; Hiroshi Hasegawa; Daigo Nakashima; Yasunari Ikuta; Fumihiro Tajima; Hiroaki Kimura; Nobuo Adachi
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 1.672

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.