Literature DB >> 6505843

Biomechanical properties of human intervertebral discs subjected to axial dynamic compression. A comparison of lumbar and thoracic discs.

W Koeller, W Meier, F Hartmann.   

Abstract

This investigation revealed biomechanical properties and some morphological parameters of isolated intervertebral discs at various disc levels. One hundred twenty-three specimens were subjected to axial dynamic compressive loads. The duration of testing was 5 minutes, the loads Fd1 = 650 N +/- 400 N (discs from T5-6 to L1-2) and Fd2 = 950 N +/- 540 N (discs from T9-10 to L5-S1). Down the spine, the mean disc heights and cross-sectional areas increased; the water content seemed to be nearly constant. Axial deformation and ventral bulging increased down the spine as well, which is mainly due to the increasing disc height. Creep showed different characteristics. It was smallest within the region T10-11 to L1-2 and increased above and below this level. The increase below L1-2 is mainly due to the increasing disc height; the increase above T10-11 occurs because the thoracic discs behave in a more viscous manner than the lumbar discs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6505843     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198410000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

1.  Dynamic stiffness and damping of human intervertebral disc using axial oscillatory displacement under a free mass system.

Authors:  O Izambert; D Mitton; M Thourot; F Lavaste
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Contribution of sensorimotor integration to spinal stabilization in humans.

Authors:  Adam D Goodworth; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Tensile properties of the annulus fibrosus. I. The contribution of fibre-matrix interactions to tensile stiffness and strength.

Authors:  M A Adams; T P Green
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Changes in Vertebral Column Height (VCH) at Different Distance Intervals During a 3-Mile Walk.

Authors:  J R Roush; M Kee; J Toeppe
Journal:  N Am J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2008-08

5.  Frequency-dependent behavior of the intervertebral disc in response to each of six degree of freedom dynamic loading: solid phase and fluid phase contributions.

Authors:  John J Costi; Ian A Stokes; Mack G Gardner-Morse; James C Iatridis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Biomechanical characterization of an annulus-sparing spinal disc prosthesis.

Authors:  Glenn R Buttermann; Brian P Beaubien
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  The effects of single-level instrumented lumbar laminectomy on adjacent spinal biomechanics.

Authors:  Arno Bisschop; Roderick M Holewijn; Idsart Kingma; Agnita Stadhouder; Pieter-Paul A Vergroesen; Albert J van der Veen; Jaap H van Dieën; Barend J van Royen
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2014-11-06

Review 8.  In Vitro Studies for Investigating Creep of Intervertebral Discs under Axial Compression: A Review of Testing Environment and Results.

Authors:  Mengying Yang; Dingding Xiang; Song Wang; Weiqiang Liu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Disc geometry measurement methods affect reported compressive mechanics by up to 65.

Authors:  Shiyin Lim; Reece D Huff; Joanna E Veres; Divya Satish; Grace D O'Connell
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2022-07-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.