Literature DB >> 6502804

When should patients with symptomatic urinary stone disease be evaluated metabolically?

R W Norman, S S Bath, W G Robertson, M Peacock.   

Abstract

To determine the optimal time at which to assess the urinary risk factors for calcium stone formation, we followed 11 patients after an episode of acute renal colic with sequential 24-hour urine collections, first in the hospital and then at regular intervals after they were discharged from the hospital. The changes that occurred in the urinary risk factors were compared to those of a control group in which samples were collected during the same interval. The in-hospital 24-hour urine volumes were high but decreased gradually to approach the relatively constant volume of the control group by 3 months. The opposite trend occurred with respect to the 24-hour urinary excretion of calcium. There were no significant changes in the 24-hour urinary pH or excretions of oxalate, uric acid and alcian blue precipitable polyanions. The over-all effect was to cause a progressive increase in the probability of stones forming in the patients. The accurate assessment of the urinary risk factors of calcium stone disease requires at least a 3-month delay following acute renal colic. This delay usually will provide sufficient time for the stone to pass and for the patient to return to the normal dietary and fluid intake.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6502804     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)50064-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  15 in total

Review 1.  Diet and calcium stones.

Authors:  J Hughes; R W Norman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-01-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Optimizing the void.

Authors:  Richard W Norman
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on stone forming risk factors.

Authors:  S Kiliç; O Yaman; K Sarica; O Göğüş; L S Yaman; O Süzer
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  [S2k guidelines on diagnostics, therapy and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis (AWMF 043/025) : Compendium].

Authors:  T Knoll; T Bach; U Humke; A Neisius; R Stein; M Schönthaler; G Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Is prevention of stone recurrence financially worthwhile?

Authors:  W G Robertson
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2006-02-03

Review 6.  Metabolic evaluation of urinary lithiasis: what urologists should know and do.

Authors:  Julien Letendre; Jonathan Cloutier; Luca Villa; Luc Valiquette
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Attitudes of urologists on metabolic evaluation for urolithiasis: outcomes of a global survey from 57 countries.

Authors:  Mehmet Ali Karagöz; Selçuk Güven; Tzevat Tefik; Mehmet İlker Gökçe; Murat Can Kiremit; Feyzi Arda Atar; Muhammed Arif İbiş; Yasin Yitgin; Abubekir Böyük; Samed Verep; Kemal Sarıca
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 2.861

8.  Some features of paediatric urolithiasis in a group of Syrian children.

Authors:  S Hadidy; M Z Shammaa; A Kharma
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 9.  Dietary recommendations and treatment of patients with recurrent idiopathic calcium stone disease.

Authors:  W G Robertson
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Large database study of urinary stone composition in South Korea: Korean Society of Endourology and Robotics (KSER) research series.

Authors:  Hae Do Jung; Ill Young Seo; Joo Yong Lee
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.