Literature DB >> 6499112

32P-post-labelling analysis of DNA adducts formed in the livers of animals treated with safrole, estragole and other naturally-occurring alkenylbenzenes. I. Adult female CD-1 mice.

K Randerath, R E Haglund, D H Phillips, M V Reddy.   

Abstract

The binding of a series of alkenylbenzenes to liver DNA of adult female CD-1 mice, isolated 24 h after i.p. administration of non-radioactive test compound (2 or 10 mg/mouse), was investigated by a modified 32P-post-labelling assay. The known hepatocarcinogens, safrole, estragole and methyleugenol, exhibited the strongest binding to mouse-liver DNA (1 adduct in 10 000 - 15 000 DNA nucleotides or 200 - 300 pmol adduct/mg DNA after administration of a 10 mg dose), while several related compounds, which have not been shown thus far to be carcinogenic in rodent bioassays, bound to mouse-liver DNA at 3 - 200x lower levels. The latter compounds included allylbenzene, anethole, myristicin, parsley apiol, dill apiol and elemicin. Eugenol did not bind. Low binding to mouse-liver DNA was also observed for the weak hepatocarcinogen, isosafrole. Two main 32P-labelled adducts, which appeared to be guanine derivatives, were detected for each of the binding chemicals on thin-layer chromatograms. The loss of safrole adducts from liver DNA was biphasic: a rapid loss during the first week (t 1/2 approximately 3 days) was followed by a much slower decline up to 20 weeks after treatment (t 1/2 approximately 2.5 months). Adducts formed by reaction of 1'-acetoxysafrole, a model ultimate carcinogen, with mouse-liver DNA in vitro were chromatographically identical to safrole-DNA adducts formed in vivo. Pretreatment with pentachlorophenol, a known inhibitor of sulphotransferases, inhibited the binding of safrole to mouse-liver DNA, providing further evidence that the metabolic activation of the allylbenzenes proceeds by the formation of 1'-hydroxy derivatives as proximate carcinogens and 1'-sulphoöxy derivatives as ultimate carcinogens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6499112     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/5.12.1613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  22 in total

1.  Quantitative evaluation of DNA binding data for risk estimation and for classification of direct and indirect carcinogens.

Authors:  W K Lutz
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  32P-adduct assay: short- and long-term persistence of 2-acetylaminofluorene-DNA adducts and other applications of the assay.

Authors:  R C Gupta
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 6.691

Review 3.  Estimation of exposure of man to substances reacting covalently with macromolecules.

Authors:  P B Farmer; H G Neumann; D Henschler
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 4.  Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens.

Authors:  Andrea Hartwig; Michael Arand; Bernd Epe; Sabine Guth; Gunnar Jahnke; Alfonso Lampen; Hans-Jörg Martus; Bernhard Monien; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Simone Schmitz-Spanke; Gerlinde Schriever-Schwemmer; Pablo Steinberg; Gerhard Eisenbrand
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 5.153

5.  Role of Metabolic Activation in Elemicin-Induced Cellular Toxicity.

Authors:  Yi-Kun Wang; Xiao-Nan Yang; Xu Zhu; Xue-Rong Xiao; Xiu-Wei Yang; Hong-Bo Qin; Frank J Gonzalez; Fei Li
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 5.279

6.  Formation and removal of DNA adducts in Fischer-344 rats exposed to 2,4-diaminotoluene.

Authors:  D K La; J R Froines
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  Comparison of DNA adduct formation between 2,4 and 2,6-dinitrotoluene by 32P-postlabelling analysis.

Authors:  D K La; J R Froines
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  Formation of 4,4'-methylene-bis(2-chloroaniline)-DNA adducts in yeast expressing recombinant cytochrome P450s.

Authors:  Y Endo-Ichikawa; H Kohno; R Tokunaga; Y Yabusaki; T Sakaki; H Ohkawa; S Taketani
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1995-06-14

9.  Can estragole in fennel seed decoctions really be considered a danger for human health? A fennel safety update.

Authors:  L Gori; E Gallo; V Mascherini; A Mugelli; A Vannacci; F Firenzuoli
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 2.629

10.  Use of physiologically based biokinetic (PBBK) modeling to study estragole bioactivation and detoxification in humans as compared with male rats.

Authors:  Ans Punt; Alicia Paini; Marelle G Boersma; Andreas P Freidig; Thierry Delatour; Gabriele Scholz; Benoît Schilter; Peter J van Bladeren; Ivonne M C M Rietjens
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.