Literature DB >> 6498571

Three per cent 2-chloroprocaine for caesarean section: appraisal of a standardized dose technique.

W D Writer, D M Dewan, F M James.   

Abstract

We evaluated 2-chloroprocaine, three per cent, in 44 women having epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section. All subjects received a minimum dose of 25 ml (750 mg) in increments designed to allow early recognition of accidental subarachnoid or intravascular injection. Further increments were given as needed to achieve a T5 sensory level or higher. We recorded pulse and blood pressure at two-minute intervals and used a simple pain scale to assess analgesia. Ninety-three per cent of subjects had acceptable analgesia. Seventeen mothers required more than 25 ml to attain a T5 level; subjects having a BMI (body mass index) equal to or greater than 35, or over 35 years of age, demonstrated more cephalad spread. Hypotension (MAP 80 per cent of control or less) occurred in 24, mothers (54 per cent), often transiently, but an infused fluid volume exceeding 30 ml X kg-1 at delivery significantly reduced post-delivery hypotension. Nausea and vomiting accompanied the hypotension in 12 mothers. No neonatal depression occurred. We conclude the incremental administration of chloroprocaine, as described, permits safe administration of the drug, with excellent analgesia in most parturients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6498571     DOI: 10.1007/bf03009543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J        ISSN: 0008-2856


  10 in total

1.  Epidural analgesia for Caesarean section. A review of 182 cases.

Authors:  M K Milne; J I Lawson
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Potential neurotoxicity of local anaesthetic agents.

Authors:  B G Covino
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1983-03

3.  Method of ephedrine administration and nausea and hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.

Authors:  S Datta; M H Alper; G W Ostheimer; J B Weiss
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 4.  Anesthesia for cesarean section.

Authors:  S Datta; M H Alper
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Epidural anesthesia for cesarean section: a comparison of bupivacaine, chloroprocaine, and etidocaine.

Authors:  S Datta; B C Corke; M H Alper; W U Brown; G W Ostheimer; J B Weiss
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Epidural analgesia for elective Caesarean section. Technique and its assessment.

Authors:  J Thorburn; D D Moir
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 6.955

7.  Prolonged sensory/motor deficits following inadvertent spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  B G Covino; G F Marx; M Finster; E K Zsigmond
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Chloroprocaine vs. bupivacaine for lumbar epidural analgesia for elective cesarean section.

Authors:  F M James; D M Dewan; H M Floyd; A S Wheeler; W M Grant; L Rhyne; R T Westmoreland
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Extradural analgesia revisited. A statistical study.

Authors:  E M Grundy; S Ramamurthy; K P Patel; M Mani; A P Winnie
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  A comparison of T4 and T7 dermatomal levels of analgesia for caesarean section using the lumbar epidural technique.

Authors:  J B Craft; M F Roizen; S D Dao; M Edwards; R Gilman
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1982-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.