Literature DB >> 6498565

A comparison of pretreatment regimens for minimizing the haemodynamic response to blind nasotracheal intubation.

M L Hartigan, J L Cleary, J B Gross, D W Schaffer.   

Abstract

The authors determined the cardiovascular effects of blind nasotracheal intubation in four randomized groups of 25 patients each. After induction of anaesthesia with IV thiopentone 4 mg X kg-1, patients in group A received no pretreatment, while patients in group B received IV lidocaine 1.5 mg X kg-1. Three minutes before induction, patients in group C received 0.25 per cent phenylephrine nasal spray (0.2 mg in each nostril); those in group D received ten per cent lidocaine nasal spray (30 mg in each nostril). After intubation, mean arterial pressures (MAP) were highest in group B (IV lidocaine) patients (p less than 0.05), remaining significantly elevated for 5 min. Conversely, within four minutes after intubation, MAP of group D (ten per cent nasal lidocaine spray) patients were below control (p less than 0.05), and lower than those of any other group (p less than 0.05). MAP of group A and C patients increased after intubation, but not as much as in group B patients (p less than 0.05). There were no adverse effects from the lidocaine nasal spray. Ten per cent lidocaine nasal spray is a safe and effective way to minimize the MAP increases which typically accompany blind nasotracheal intubation in lightly anaesthetized patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6498565     DOI: 10.1007/bf03009533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J        ISSN: 0008-2856


  9 in total

1.  Reflex circulatory responses to tracheal intubation performed under topical anesthesia.

Authors:  B D KING; J D ELDER; D F PROCTOR; R D DRIPPS
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1954-05       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Reflex circulatory responses to direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation performed during general anesthesia.

Authors:  B D KING; L C HARRIS; F E GREIFENSTEIN; J D ELDER; R D DRIPPS
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1951-09       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Complications related to the pressor response to endotracheal intubation.

Authors:  E J Fox; G S Sklar; C H Hill; R Villanueva; B D King
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Indirect measurement of mean blood pressure in the anesthetized patient.

Authors:  M Yelderman; A K Ream
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Effects of intratracheal lidocaine on circulatory responses to tracheal intubation.

Authors:  J K Denlinger; N Ellison; A J Ominsky
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Studies of anaesthesia in relation to hypertension. II. Haemodynamic consequences of induction and endotracheal intubation.

Authors:  C Prys-Roberts; L T Greene; R Meloche; P Foëx
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Cardiovascular reactions to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation following small and large intravenous doses of lidocaine.

Authors:  M N Abou-Madi; H Keszler; J M Yacoub
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1977-01

8.  Lidocaine before endotracheal intubation: intravenous or laryngotracheal?

Authors:  J F Hamill; R F Bedford; D C Weaver; A R Colohan
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Low-dose fentanyl blunts circulatory responses to tracheal intubation.

Authors:  D E Martin; H Rosenberg; S J Aukburg; R R Bartkowski; M W Edwards; D E Greenhow; P L Klineberg
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 5.108

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of cardiac output and hemodynamic responses of intubation among different videolaryngoscopies in normotensive and hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Amro Faez Abdelgawad; Qin-Fang Shi; Mohamed Abo Halawa; Zhi-Lin Wu; Zhou-Yang Wu; Xiang-Dong Chen; Shang-Long Yao
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2015-06-14

2.  Haemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation in coronary artery disease: Direct versus video laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Muralidhar Kanchi; Hema C Nair; Sanjay Banakal; Keshava Murthy; C Murugesan
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2011-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.