Literature DB >> 6498111

Cotton induced bronchoconstriction detected by a forced random noise oscillator.

M J Sepulveda, J L Hankinson, R M Castellan, J B Cocke.   

Abstract

Lung function responses to inhaled cotton dust were evaluated in a group of 58 healthy subjects by spirometry (MEFV curves) and forced random noise impedance parameters. Twenty-one of these subjects were also examined by body plethysmography to assess changes in airway resistance (Raw). For the study group as a whole, alterations in lung mechanical function after exposure to cotton dust were detected by maximal expiratory volumes and flows (p less than 0.001) and impedance parameters (p less than 0.01) but not by Raw. Subjects showing responses in MEFV curves also showed increases in Thevenin or effective resistance at low frequencies (R1, R5-9, R5-9/R20-24), suggesting that the limitation of flow occurred predominantly in the peripheral airways. By contrast, non-responders on MEFV measurements were found to have significant increases in effective resistance both at low and at high frequencies (R1, R5-9, R20-24), suggesting a central airways effect. MEFV curve non-responders also exhibited a significantly lower baseline effective resistance profile than MEFV curve responders. The data indicate that under the conditions of the experiment measures of the Thevenin resistance (real part of impedence) by the forced random noise method are reliable indicators of cotton induced bronchoconstriction. Measurement variability, however, suggests that, at present, these are more appropriate for group studies and should remain adjuncts to standard tests of lung function such as spirometry.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6498111      PMCID: PMC1009373          DOI: 10.1136/oem.41.4.480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ind Med        ISSN: 0007-1072


  14 in total

1.  Responses to cotton dust.

Authors:  J A Merchant; G M Halprin; A R Hudson; K H Kilburn; W N McKenzie; D J Hurst; P Bermazohn
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1975-05

2.  The maximal expiratory flow-volume curve. Normal standards, variability, and effects of age.

Authors:  R J Knudson; R C Slatin; M D Lebowitz; B Burrows
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1976-05

3.  Estimating central and peripheral respiratory resistance: an alternative analysis.

Authors:  A S Slutsky; J M Drazen
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1979-12

4.  Correlation of airway resistance with forced random noise resistance parameters.

Authors:  R L Pimmel; J M Fullton; J F Ginsberg; M J Hazucha; E D Haak; W F McDonnell; P A Bromberg
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1981-07

5.  Estimating central and peripheral respiratory resistance.

Authors:  R L Pimmel; M J Tsai; D C Winter; P A Bromberg
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1978-09

6.  Cold urticaria: release into the circulation of histamine and eosinophil chemotactic factor of anaphylaxis during cold challenge.

Authors:  N A Soter; S I Wasserman; K F Austen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-03-25       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Detection of respiratory mechanical dysfunction by forced random noise impedance parameters.

Authors:  D A Hayes; R L Pimmel; J M Fullton; P A Bromberg
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1979-11

8.  Predominant site of flow limitation and mechanisms of postexertional asthma.

Authors:  E R McFadden; R H Ingram; R L Haynes; J J Wellman
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1977-05

9.  Pulmonary mechanics by spectral analysis of forced random noise.

Authors:  E D Michaelson; E D Grassman; W R Peters
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Respiratory mechanics and dust exposure in byssinosis.

Authors:  A Bouhuys; K P Van de Woestijne
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.