Literature DB >> 6496982

Maternal, fetal, and neonatal effects of lidocaine with and without epinephrine for epidural anesthesia in obstetrics.

T K Abboud, S David, S Nagappala, J Costandi, T Yanagi, S Haroutunian, S U Yeh.   

Abstract

The effects of epidural lidocaine with and without 1:300,000 epinephrine on uterine activity, progress of labor, fetal heart rate, maternal blood pressure and heart rate, newborn Apgar scores, neonatal acid-base status, and the Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity Scoring System were compared in 30 parturients during labor and delivery. Patients in group I (n = 16) received 1.5% lidocaine with 1:300,000 epinephrine and those in group II (n = 14) 1.5% lidocaine alone. Addition of epinephrine to lidocaine did not have any significant effects on uterine activity, duration of first or second stages of labor, fetal heart rate variability, or the incidence of abnormal fetal heart rate patterns. Maternal heart rate and the incidence of hypotensive episodes did not differ significantly between the two groups of patients. Apgar scores, neonatal acid-base status, and the NACS were equally good in the two groups. Duration of analgesia was significantly longer in group I as compared to group II patients (106.9 +/- 6.6 vs 66.2 +/- 4.4 min, P less than 0.001). Umbilical venous concentrations of lidocaine and umbilical vein to maternal vein ratios of lidocaine were significantly higher in group II patients (P less than 0.05). It is concluded that addition of epinephrine to lidocaine during epidural anesthesia in the normal parturient has no adverse effects on mother, fetus, neonate, or the progress of labor and it significantly prolongs the duration of anesthesia and limits the placental transfer of lidocaine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6496982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  4 in total

1.  Lidocaine protein binding in preeclampsia.

Authors:  M B Bottorff; J A Pieper; B A Boucher; T J Hoon; J Ramanathan; B M Sibai
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 2.  The epidural test dose in obstetrics: is it necessary?

Authors:  S L Dain; S H Rolbin; E M Hew
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 3.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of epidural and spinal anaesthesia.

Authors:  A G Burm
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  A comparative study of two different doses of epidural neostigmine coadministered with lignocaine for post operative analgesia and sedation.

Authors:  Mamta Harjai; Girish Chandra; V K Bhatia; Dinesh Singh; Priyesh Bhaskar
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.