Literature DB >> 6495034

Effectiveness of braces in mild idiopathic scoliosis.

J A Miller, A L Nachemson, A B Schultz.   

Abstract

Despite the wide use of bracing for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis, controlled studies apparently have not been performed to examine whether bracing, in fact, alters the natural history of spine lateral curves. We studied 255 female patients, ages 8-17 years, with idiopathic scoliosis who had curves with initial Cobb measures from 15-30 degrees. They were divided into two groups: one group consisted of 144 patients who had received a Milwaukee or Boston brace; and the other, a control group, consisted of 111 patients who remained untreated through a mean period of 1.9 years. The groups had similar mean ages, ages of menarche and curve severities. The results showed a slight but nonsignificant trend, suggesting that bracing reduced the overall probability of progression in the braced curves. However, noting that nearly 75% of the control group curves were nonprogressive, it is possible that a similar proportion of the braced curves need not have been braced. Moreover, bracing failed to prevent eight curves in seven patients (5%) from progressing. These curves progressed at a mean rate of 8 degrees per year. Our retrospective results suggest that bracing probably is not necessary in a large proportion of patients who meet current, clinical criteria for bracing. Given the limitations of retrospective studies like this one, a controlled prospective trial of bracing effectiveness in idiopathic scoliosis seems warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6495034     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198409000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

1.  Design of the Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial (BrAIST).

Authors:  Stuart L Weinstein; Lori A Dolan; James G Wright; Matthew B Dobbs
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Professional opinion concerning the effectiveness of bracing relative to observation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Lori A Dolan; Melanie J Donnelly; Kevin F Spratt; Stuart L Weinstein
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2007 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.324

Review 3.  Idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  R A Dickson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-04-08

4.  Effect of bracing on respiratory mechanics in mild idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  J D Kennedy; C F Robertson; I Hudson; P D Phelan
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  Pulmonary restrictive effect of bracing in mild idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  J D Kennedy; C F Robertson; A Olinsky; D R Dickens; P D Phelan
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 6.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  L A Rinsky; J G Gamble
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1988-02

7.  Preference assessment of recruitment into a randomized trial for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Lori A Dolan; Vani Sabesan; Stuart L Weinstein; Kevin F Spratt
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Clinical effect of continuous corrective force delivery in the non-operative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective cohort study of the TriaC-brace.

Authors:  Gerben J Bulthuis; Albert G Veldhuizen; Gert Nijenbanning
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Dual modality of vertebral body tethering : anterior scoliosis correction versus growth modulation with mean follow-up of five years.

Authors:  Jason Bernard; Timothy Bishop; Jan Herzog; Shahnawaz Haleem; Cristina Lupu; Bisola Ajayi; Darren F Lui
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.