Literature DB >> 6493704

Grating and recognition acuities of pediatric patients.

D L Mayer, A B Fulton, D Rodier.   

Abstract

Acuities for gratings obtained by preferential looking (PL) that differed from expectations based upon the ophthalmologic examination prompted this study. Older pediatric patients (124 patients; mean age, 6.5 years) were tested by the PL grating test and a test of recognition acuity (pictures or letters). On the average, grating acuity was better than recognition acuity. In patients with dense amblyopia or foveal abnormalities, very large discrepancies between grating and recognition acuities were found. In nonamblyopic patients, acuities were no more discrepant than for children with normal eyes. Amblyopia was less dense by grating acuities than by recognition acuities; grating acuities were sensitive, however, to refractive and organic amblyopia but not to strabismic amblyopia. Possible explanations include the heterogeneity of patients' eye disorders, single vs. linear acuity, stimulus size and relative complexity of stimuli. These results can aid in evaluating PL grating acuities of preverbal patients, and suggest modifications of stimuli to investigate amblyogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6493704     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(84)34209-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  19 in total

Review 1.  The management of squint.

Authors:  A R Fielder
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Monocular activation of V1 and V2 in amblyopic adults measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ian P Conner; J Vernon Odom; Terry L Schwartz; Janine D Mendola
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 1.220

3.  Abnormal radial deformation hyperacuity in children with strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  Vidhya Subramanian; Sarah E Morale; Yi-Zhong Wang; Eileen E Birch
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Adult discrimination performance for pediatric acuity test optotypes.

Authors:  T Rowan Candy; Sylvia R Mishoulam; Robert M Nosofsky; Velma Dobson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Grating and recognition acuities of young amblyopes.

Authors:  M J Moseley; A R Fielder; J R Thompson; C Minshull; D Price
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Subfoveal fluid in healthy full-term newborns observed by handheld spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Michelle T Cabrera; Ramiro S Maldonado; Cynthia A Toth; Rachelle V O'Connell; Bei Bei Chen; Stephanie J Chiu; Sina Farsiu; David K Wallace; Sandra S Stinnett; Gabriela M Maradiaga Panayotti; Geeta K Swamy; Sharon F Freedman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Correlation of monocular grating acuity at age 12 months with recognition acuity at age 4.5 years: findings from the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study.

Authors:  E Eugenie Hartmann; Carolyn Drews-Botsch; Lindreth G DuBois; George Cotsonis; Scott R Lambert
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 1.220

8.  Current concepts in the management of amblyopia.

Authors:  Blanca Ruiz de Zárate; Jaime Tejedor
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-12

9.  The teller acuity cards are effective in detecting amblyopia.

Authors:  James R Drover; Lauren M Wyatt; David R Stager; Eileen E Birch
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Evaluation of central, steady, maintained fixation grading for predicting inter-eye visual acuity difference to diagnose and treat amblyopia in strabismic patients.

Authors:  Mihir Kothari; Amar Bhaskare; Deepali Mete; Svetlana Toshniwal; Priti Doshi; Shalini Kaul
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.