Literature DB >> 6492907

Use of a surrogate for the Sickness Impact Profile.

J McCusker, A M Stoddard.   

Abstract

The use of a surrogate Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) score was investigated in a sample of 66 chronically or terminally ill homebound patients and their caretakers. Statistically significant differences in category scores (P less than 0.05) were found in only two categories. Profile analysis revealed no systematic differences between patient and caretaker responses, and agreement was generally quite high. Agreement of a surrogate SIP was somewhat lower if the patient was suffering from a terminal condition, if the patient had lower educational attainment, or if the caretaker did not live in the same household as the patient. Agreement did not appear to be affected by a diagnosis of a neurologic or psychiatric condition, by the patient's age or degree of dysfunction, or by the relationship of the caretaker to the patient. Overall, the results of the study are encouraging with regard to use of surrogate SIP total and dimension scores for group-level analysis of chronically ill patients if the surrogate is a family member who is closely involved in the patient's care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6492907     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198409000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  10 in total

1.  Quality of life following critical care: moving beyond survival.

Authors:  D K Heyland; D J Kutsogiannis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Health status in patients with Alzheimer's disease: an investigation of inter-rater agreement.

Authors:  J L Novella; F Boyer; C Jochum; N Jovenin; I Morrone; D Jolly; S Bakchine; F Blanchard
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Is upper gastrointestinal radiography necessary in the initial management of uncomplicated dyspepsia? A randomized controlled trial comparing empiric antacid therapy plus patient reassurance with traditional care.

Authors:  J D Goodson; J W Lehmann; J M Richter; J L Read; S Atamian; G A Colditz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Agreement between patients' and proxies' reports of quality of life in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  J L Novella; C Jochum; D Jolly; I Morrone; J Ankri; F Bureau; F Blanchard
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Agreement between self reports and proxy reports of quality of life in epilepsy patients.

Authors:  R D Hays; B G Vickrey; B P Hermann; K Perrine; J Cramer; K Meador; K Spritzer; O Devinsky
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Do proxies reflect patients' health concerns about urinary incontinence and gait problems?

Authors:  Takahiro Higashi; Ron D Hays; Julie A Brown; Caren J Kamberg; Chau Pham; David B Reuben; Paul G Shekelle; David H Solomon; Roy T Young; Carol P Roth; John T Chang; Catherine H MacLean; Neil S Wenger
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Quality of life in dementia: a study on proxy bias.

Authors:  Alexander M M Arons; Paul F M Krabbe; Carla J M Schölzel-Dorenbos; Gert Jan van der Wilt; Marcel G M Olde Rikkert
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 8.  Quality of Life Measurement in Dogs and Cats: A Scoping Review of Generic Tools.

Authors:  Annabelle E Fulmer; Linda J Laven; Kate E Hill
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Do patients and carers agree on symptom burden in advanced COPD?

Authors:  Emma Mi; Ella Mi; Gail Ewing; Patrick White; Ravi Mahadeva; A Carole Gardener; Morag Farquhar
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2018-03-22

10.  Development and evaluation of a health-related quality-of-life tool for dogs with Cushing's syndrome.

Authors:  Imogen Schofield; Dan G O'Neill; Dave C Brodbelt; David B Church; Rebecca F Geddes; Stijn J M Niessen
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.333

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.