Literature DB >> 649178

Break points in human chromosomes.

C W Yu, D S Borgaonkar, D R Bolling.   

Abstract

Break points of structural rearrangements of human chromosomes can be identified by banding techniques. The present study attempts to analyze the randomness and the distribution of the reported spontaneous break points in the human genome. Reports of break points in structural rearrangements of human chromosomes from the published sources up to October 1976 were analyzed. Based on the assumption that each unit length of band has an equal chance of being broken, chi2 tests show that positions of breakage are highly non-random; that is, breaks are more frequent in the negative band areas and in the centromeric and terminal regions. In double-break rearrangements the same band types tend to rejoin. The distribution of breaks is not proportional to the chromosome length. The longer chromosomes (i.e., 1--12, X) have a lower number of breaks per unit length, while the shorter chromosomes (i.e., 13--22, Y) have a greater number of breaks per unit length with the exception of chromosomes 4, 9, 10, 16, 17, 19, 20 and X. Out of the whole genome, chromosomes 9, 13, 18, 21, 22 and Y have the most breaks per unit length and chromosomes 16, 6, 2, 3 and 19 have the fewest. 18p11, 21q22 and Yp11 are the three bands with most frequent breaks. There are 53 bands where no breaks have been reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 649178     DOI: 10.1159/000152960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Hered        ISSN: 0001-5652            Impact factor:   0.444


  5 in total

1.  Kinetochore reproduction in animal evolution: cell biological explanation of karyotypic fission theory.

Authors:  R L Kolnicki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Hotspots of mutation and breakage in dog and human chromosomes.

Authors:  Caleb Webber; Chris P Ponting
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Comparative mapping of the constitutional and tumor-associated 11;22 translocations.

Authors:  M Budarf; B Sellinger; C Griffin; B S Emanuel
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 4.  Distribution of break points in human structural rearrangements.

Authors:  Y Nakagome; T Matsubara; H Fujita
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Non-Random Distribution of Reciprocal Translocation Breakpoints in the Pig Genome.

Authors:  Brendan Donaldson; Daniel A F Villagomez; Tamas Revay; Samira Rezaei; W Allan King
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 4.096

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.