Literature DB >> 6491636

Responsiveness of neurons in the hamster parabrachial nuclei to taste mixtures.

S P Travers, D V Smith.   

Abstract

Responses from hamster parabrachial nuclei neurons to stimulation of the anterior tongue with sucrose, NaCl, HCl, quinine hydrochloride, and the six two-component mixtures of these stimuli were recorded. A cell's response to a mixture approached its response to the mixture's more effective component in the majority of cases, but was sometimes greater or smaller than this response. The best predictor of a neuron's response to a mixture, then, was its response to the mixture's more effective component. The single-component stimulus producing the maximum response was determined for each neuron and the response to this stimulus was compared with the responses evoked by the six mixtures. For 30% of the cells, a mixture elicited a response reliably, but only 1.1-2.1 times greater than the response to the best single-component stimulus. Thus, there were no neurons specialized to respond to these mixtures. The across-neuron patterns elicited by mixtures and the responses of best-stimulus classes to mixtures were studied for comparison with psychophysical data on taste mixtures. Mixtures were usually correlated with single-component stimuli in the mixture, but not with stimuli not in the mixture. In fact, five of the six mixtures fell directly between their components in a multidimensional scaling plot. In addition, a mixture was most effective in stimulating only those classes of neurons maximally stimulated by the mixture's components. These results correlate with psychophysical data suggesting that mixtures of taste stimuli evoke the same taste qualities as evoked by the mixture's components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6491636      PMCID: PMC2228737          DOI: 10.1085/jgp.84.2.221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1295            Impact factor:   4.086


  13 in total

1.  Gustatory neural circuitry in the hamster brain stem.

Authors:  Young K Cho; Cheng-Shu Li
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Modulation of taste processing by temperature.

Authors:  Christian H Lemon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Masking the Detection of Taste Stimuli in Rats: NaCl and Sucrose.

Authors:  Ginger D Blonde; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Somatosensory factors in taste perception: effects of active tasting and solution temperature.

Authors:  Barry G Green; Danielle Nachtigal
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-05-17

5.  Sweet Thermal Taste: Perceptual Characteristics in Water and Dependence on TAS1R2/TAS1R3.

Authors:  Danielle Nachtigal; Barry G Green
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Responses of the hamster chorda tympani nerve to sucrose+acid and sucrose+citrate taste mixtures.

Authors:  Bradley K Formaker; Hsung Lin; Thomas P Hettinger; Marion E Frank
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Taste coding of complex naturalistic taste stimuli and traditional taste stimuli in the parabrachial pons of the awake, freely licking rat.

Authors:  Joshua D Sammons; Michael S Weiss; Jonathan D Victor; Patricia M Di Lorenzo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Sweet-bitter and umami-bitter taste interactions in single parabrachial neurons in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Kenichi Tokita; John D Boughter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Modulation of central gustatory coding by temperature.

Authors:  David M Wilson; Christian H Lemon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Bitter-responsive gustatory neurons in the rat parabrachial nucleus.

Authors:  Laura C Geran; Susan P Travers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.