Literature DB >> 6491014

Effects of exogenous oxytocin on production and milking variables of cows.

R C Gorewit, R Sagi.   

Abstract

Five doses of oxytocin (.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0 IU) were injected through the subcutaneous abdominal vein (milk vein) of 15 Holstein Friesian cows 1 min before machine attachment. After teat cup removal, cows were given 10 IU of oxytocin via the milk vein for measurement of residual milk 1. An additional 10 IU of oxytocin was given 15 min later for estimating residual milk 2. Total milk yield was slightly higher for cows receiving 2.0 and 3.0 IU oxytocin. Milk fat yield was highest for cows receiving 2.0 and 3.0 IU oxytocin. Percent milk protein was less for cows receiving higher doses. Administration of 2.0 or 3.0 IU oxytocin significantly reduced total residual milk yield as compared with other doses. Fat percent in total residual milk was not affected by administration of oxytocin. Machine-on time, peak flow rate, and average milk flow rate did not differ with oxytocin treatment. A dose of either 2.0 or 3.0 IU oxytocin given via the milk vein will lead to slightly higher milk yields but will not affect milk flow dynamics as compared with lower doses. Moreover, milk fat yield is increased and total residual milk yield is decreased with either 2.0 or 3.0 IU oxytocin, suggesting that these doses result in more efficient extraction of milk. Administering more than 3.0 IU of oxytocin intravenously to promote milk ejection should be of no advantage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6491014     DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(84)81543-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  5 in total

Review 1.  A review of some aspects of the pharmacology of oxytocin in domestic animals.

Authors:  M M al-Eknah; A M Homeida
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Oxytocin stimulates secretory processes in lactating rabbit mammary epithelial cells.

Authors:  Vanessa Lollivier; Pierre-Guy Marnet; Serge Delpal; Dominique Rainteau; Caroline Achard; Aline Rabot; Michèle Ollivier-Bousquet
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Letter to the editor: Comments on Schalich et al. (2021), Colostrum testing with Brix is a valuable on-farm tool. doi.org/10.193/jas/skab083.

Authors:  Jason Lombard; James Quigley; Deborah Haines; Frank Garry; Tom Earleywine; Natalie Urie; Manuel Chamorro; Sondra Godden; Sheila McGuirk; Geof Smith; Chelsey Shivley; Dan Catherman; A Jud Heinrichs; Robert James; John Maas; Keith Sterner; Don Sockett
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Contradictions on colostrum IgG levels and Brix values are real and can be explained. Response to letter by Lombard et al. (2022).

Authors:  Kasey M Schalich; Vimal Selvaraj
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.338

5.  An odor timer in milk? Synchrony in the odor of milk effluvium and neonatal chemosensation in the mouse.

Authors:  Syrina Al Aïn; Laurine Belin; Bruno Patris; Benoist Schaal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.