Literature DB >> 6487676

Superposition of impulse activity in a rapidly-adapting afferent unit model.

M D Goldfinger.   

Abstract

Mechanosensory afferent units consist of a parent axon, the peripheral axonal arborization, and the branch terminal mechanoreceptors. The present work uses a mathematical model to describe the contribution of a given number of rapidly-adapting mechanoreceptors to the impulse pattern of their parent axon. In the model, impulses initiated by any driven mechanoreceptor instantaneously propagate orthodromically and antidromically. The model also incorporates the axonal absolute refractory period as well as ortho- and antidromically elicited recovery cycles. In separate computations, periodic or random (Poisson process) trains of short-duration stimuli at constant amplitude are delivered to a given number (N = 2-30) of co-innervated mechanoreceptors. The superposition of component impulse trains always departs from the theoretical ideal (Poisson process). Such departures are attributable to: (i) the number of driven mechanoreceptors, when N is small, (ii) axonal absolute refractory period, during maximal amplitude stimulation, and (iii) antidromic recovery cycles as well as absolute refractoriness, during submaximal-amplitude stimulation. Computations reveal that this "instantaneous reset" model results in the elimination of information extracted by driven mechanoreceptors. Model predictions with Poisson stimulation at varied amplitudes are compared to G-hair afferent unit responses to analogous stimulation. Qualitatively opposite results with respect to parent axonal impulse patterns imply that the axonal arborization is not simply a substrate for impulse propagation from branch terminals to parent axon.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6487676     DOI: 10.1007/bf00335195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  21 in total

1.  Responses of the nerve terminal of the Pacinian corpuscle.

Authors:  C C HUNT; A TAKEUCHI
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The fine structure of lamellated receptors in the skin of Rana esculenta.

Authors:  M von Düring; W Seiler
Journal:  Z Anat Entwicklungsgesch       Date:  1974

3.  Impulse generation in type I cutaneous mechanoreceptors.

Authors:  K W Horch; D Whitehorn; P R Burgess
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Afferent fibers with multiple encoding sites.

Authors:  J P Eagles; R L Purple
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1974-09-06       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Differential conduction block in branches of a bifurcating axon.

Authors:  Y Grossman; I Parnas; M E Spira
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Interaction of activity in frog skin touch afferent units.

Authors:  M D Goldfinger; Y Fukami
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Response of cutaneous hair and field mechanoreceptors in cat to threshold stimuli.

Authors:  R P Tuckett; K W Horch; P R Burgess
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Intracellular recording from vertebrate myelinated axons: mechanism of the depolarizing afterpotential.

Authors:  E F Barrett; J N Barrett
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Response of forelimb guard hair afferent units to air-jet stimulation of entire receptive field.

Authors:  M D Goldfinger; V E Amassian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Contributions by individual guard hairs and their interactions in response of forelimb guard hair afferent unit.

Authors:  M D Goldfinger; V E Amassian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  4 in total

1.  The influence of an unmyelinated terminal on repetitive firing of a mammalian receptor afferent fiber.

Authors:  F Awiszus
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  Alteration of neural action potential patterns by axonal stimulation: the importance of stimulus location.

Authors:  Patrick E Crago; Nathaniel S Makowski
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Multichannel transmission of proprioceptive input to motoneurons.

Authors:  B W Feenstra; R H Tanke; A Crowe
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  Poisson process stimulation of an excitable membrane cable model.

Authors:  M D Goldfinger
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.033

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.