Literature DB >> 6487525

The value of contact procedures for tuberculosis in Edinburgh.

S Capewell, A G Leitch.   

Abstract

We have reviewed the value of routine contact procedures (CP) in screening for tuberculosis in the Edinburgh area. Nine hundred and forty-seven index cases were notified during the 5-year period 1977-81; of these, 131 (14%) were detected by CP, 78 had previously undetected tuberculous disease and a further 53 required chemoprophylaxis (CPX). None had presented with symptoms, and disease was consequently detected at an earlier stage with fewer being sputum smear positive (10% vs 29% P less than 0.01). The 131 cases were found by CP during the screening of 4445 contacts, an overall yield of 2.9%. The highest yield was 18% for close contacts of sputum smear positive index cases, the yield for the casual contact being only 3%. The overall yield for contacts of smear negative respiratory and non-respiratory index cases was less than 2% in each group. Young contacts were particularly vulnerable and the yield in Asian children was 10.2%, twice that of the 4.9% in non-Asian children (P less than 0.001). The incidence of new cases in contacts who had previous BCG vaccination was significantly lower than that in non-vaccinated contacts (1.15% vs 3.06% P less than 0.001) suggesting a protective effect of 62%. One hundred and twenty-five (95%) of the 131 new cases were diagnosed within 3 months of first attendance, the remaining 5% at 6 months. The workload involved in screening contacts in this series could have been halved by restricting CP to all contacts of sputum smear positive index cases and only the close contacts of all other index cases. This would have resulted in missing 18% of the new cases, or three cases of tuberculosis and two cases requiring CPX per year, in a population of 608 000. Seventy-two (7.6%) of the 947 index cases were of Asian origin. Their disease occurred more in young adults, especially women, and was more frequently extrapulmonary in site (25% vs 12% in non-Asians P less than 0.01). We conclude that contact procedures remain valuable in the detection of new, asymptomatic cases of tuberculosis in Edinburgh and, by implication, in other urban areas of the United Kingdom. Particular efforts should be directed towards children, Asians and those without BCG vaccination, especially if they have been in contact with sputum smear positive index cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6487525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dis Chest        ISSN: 0007-0971


  13 in total

1.  Scottish national survey of tuberculosis notifications 1993 with special reference to the prevalence of HIV seropositivity.

Authors:  A G Leitch; M Rubilar; J Curnow; G Boyd; G I Forbes; S Burns; B Watt
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Notification of tuberculosis: can the pathologist help?

Authors:  B L Bradley; K M Kerr; A G Leitch; D Lamb
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-09-03

3.  Expanding tuberculosis case detection by screening household contacts.

Authors:  Mercedes C Becerra; Iliana F Pachao-Torreblanca; Jaime Bayona; Rosa Celi; Sonya S Shin; Jim Yong Kim; Paul E Farmer; Megan Murray
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Improving notification rates for tuberculosis.

Authors:  J S Brown; F Wells; G Duckworth; E A Paul; N C Barnes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-04-15

5.  The diagnostic usefulness of a DNA probe for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (Gen-Probe) in Bactec cultures versus other diagnostic methods.

Authors:  M Telenti; J F de Quirós; M Alvarez; M J Santos Rionda; M C Mendoza
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.553

6.  Childhood tuberculosis in Leeds, 1982-90: social and ethnic factors and the role of the contact clinic in diagnosis.

Authors:  J M Goldman; C Teale; D B Cundall; S B Pearson
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Notification of tuberculosis: how many cases are never reported?

Authors:  C D Sheldon; K King; H Cock; P Wilkinson; N C Barnes
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 8.  Contact investigation for tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gregory J Fox; Simone E Barry; Warwick J Britton; Guy B Marks
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 9.  Co-evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Homo sapiens.

Authors:  Daniela Brites; Sebastien Gagneux
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 12.988

10.  The infectiousness of tuberculosis patients coinfected with HIV.

Authors:  A Roderick Escombe; David A J Moore; Robert H Gilman; William Pan; Marcos Navincopa; Eduardo Ticona; Carlos Martínez; Luz Caviedes; Patricia Sheen; Armando Gonzalez; Catherine J Noakes; Jon S Friedland; Carlton A Evans
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.