Literature DB >> 6482843

Analysis of variations in contrast-detail experiments.

G Cohen, D L McDaniel, L K Wagner.   

Abstract

Three sources of variability in a contrast-detail (CD) experiment have been quantitated: within-observer variance, between-observer variance, and sample variance. It is concluded that (1) it is more efficient to increase the numbers of replicated images and observers than to increase the number of readings; (2) sampling and between-observer variations are approximately equal; (3) one can expect approximately 10% standard errors in the measured value of threshold detail or threshold contrast in a CD experiment which employs four observers, four replicate image samples, and one reading per observer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6482843     DOI: 10.1118/1.595539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  4 in total

1.  Optimization of a contrast-detail-based method for electronic image display quality evaluation.

Authors:  N J Hangiandreou; K A Fetterly; J P Felmlee
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Cluster signal-to-noise analysis for evaluation of the information content in an image.

Authors:  Warangkana Weerawanich; Mayumi Shimizu; Yohei Takeshita; Kazutoshi Okamura; Shoko Yoshida; Kazunori Yoshiura
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Extended detail contrasts for TO.10 use on flat panel detector fluoroscopy systems.

Authors:  Dean McCarthy; Patrick Kenny
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.629

4.  Pragmatic Approaches to Reducing Radiation Dose in Brain Computed Tomography Scan using Scan Parameter Modification.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Choopani; Iraj Abedi; Fatemeh Dalvand
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2022-07-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.