Literature DB >> 6479505

The comparative absorption and excretion of chemical vapors by the upper, lower, and intact respiratory tract of rats.

W T Stott, M J McKenna.   

Abstract

Upper respiratory tract (URT) absorption of several compounds with differing water solubilities and potentials to cause lesions of the nasal mucosa were studied in rats. Absorption of propylene glycol monomethyl ether (PGME), PGME acetate (PGMEAc), ethyl acrylate (EA), epichlorohydrin (EPI), styrene (STY), nitroethane (NE), ethylene dibromide (EDB), and methylene chloride (MeCl2) vapors by the isolated URT was compared to that by the isolated lower respiratory tract (LRT) and the intact animal. Nearly all PGME and PGMEAc and 30-70% of EA, EPI, STY, NE, and EDB were absorbed when passed through the URT. In general, similar levels were absorbed by both the isolated LRT and intact animal. It was estimated that intact animals received more than 90% of their total dose of PGME and PGMEAc, and 50% of EA, NE, EPI, and EDB via the URT. Further, the dosage per unit of surface area in the URT may be 5000-6000 times that of the LRT. However, the extent of URT absorption was not related to the ability to cause lesions of the nasal mucosa. Absorption of compounds by the URT was not a simple function of water solubility or of blood or water/air partitioning coefficients suggesting that a more complex mechanism for controlling absorption may exist. In one case, it was demonstrated that URT enzymatic activity could influence the absorption of certain compounds by the URT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6479505     DOI: 10.1016/0272-0590(84)90049-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol        ISSN: 0272-0590


  10 in total

1.  Experimental data from closed chamber gas uptake studies in rodents suggest lower uptake rate of chemical than calculated from literature values on alveolar ventilation.

Authors:  G Johanson; J G Filser
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 5.153

2.  Response of the macaque nasal epithelium to ambient levels of ozone. A morphologic and morphometric study of the transitional and respiratory epithelium.

Authors:  J R Harkema; C G Plopper; D M Hyde; J A St George; D W Wilson; D L Dungworth
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Acute airway irritation of methyl formate in mice.

Authors:  Søren T Larsen; Gunnar D Nielsen
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 5.153

4.  Assessment and discrimination of odor stimuli in rat olfactory bulb by dynamic functional MRI.

Authors:  F Xu; I Kida; F Hyder; R G Shulman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Methanol inhalation: site and other factors influencing absorption, and an inhalation toxicokinetic model for the rat.

Authors:  R A Perkins; K W Ward; G M Pollack
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Liquid/air partition coefficients of six commonly used glycol ethers.

Authors:  G Johanson; B Dynésius
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1988-08

7.  Chronic occupational exposure to organic solvents. XV. Glycol ether exposure during the manufacture of brakehoses.

Authors:  B Hubner; G Lehnert; K H Schaller; D Welte; J Angerer
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Cytopathology of the nasal mucosa in chronic exposure to diesel engine emission: a five-year survey of Swiss customs officers.

Authors:  Ulrich Glück; Rudolf Schütz; Jan-Olaf Gebbers
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Biotransformation enzymes in the rodent nasal mucosa: the value of a histochemical approach.

Authors:  M S Bogdanffy
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Airflow, gas deposition, and lesion distribution in the nasal passages.

Authors:  K T Morgan; T M Monticello
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.