Literature DB >> 6477779

Pacemaker dependence in patients with bifascicular block during acute anterior myocardial infarction.

O Edhag, L Bergfeldt, N Edvardsson, S Holmberg, M Rosenqvist, H Vallin.   

Abstract

Eleven patients with bifascicular block complicating anteroseptal acute myocardial infarction were studied to determine the effect of prophylactic permanent pacing; eight of them also had transient high grade atrioventricular block during the acute phase of the infarction. One month after the infarction an electrophysiological study was performed and a bradycardia indicating pacemaker implanted. All the patients were followed for two years. Six had bradycardia detected, two of whom did not have high grade atrioventricular block during the index infarction. Seven patients died, four of them suddenly. There was no correlation between the electrophysiological findings and subsequent development of bradycardia. Thus pacemaker dependence seems to be common in patients with bifascicular block complicating acute myocardial infarction. Mortality is, however, also high in patients treated with pacemakers. Prospective studies to determine the predictive factors in those patients with an anterior acute myocardial infarction and who benefit from a combination of permanent pacemaker treatment and antiarrhythmic treatment are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6477779      PMCID: PMC481650          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.52.4.408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN: 0007-0769


  13 in total

1.  The significance of bundle branch block during acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A A Nimetz; S J Shubrooks; A M Hutter; R W DeSanctis
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Immediate and remote prognostic significance of fascicular block during acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R A Waugh; G S Wagner; T L Haney; R A Rosati; J J Morris
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Ventricular conduction blocks and sudden death in acute myocardial infarction. Potential indications for pacing.

Authors:  J M Atkins; S J Leshin; G Blomqvist; C B Mullins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1973-02-08       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Early identification of patients developing late in-hospital ventricular fibrillation after discharge from the coronary care unit. A 5 1/2 year retrospective and prospective study of 1,897 patients.

Authors:  K I Lie; K L Liem; R M Schuilenburg; G K David; D Durrer
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 5.  Bundle branch block and sudden death.

Authors:  G R Fisch; D P Zipes; C Fisch
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  1980 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.194

6.  Autonomous influence on sinus node and AV node function in the elderly without significant heart disease: assessment with electrophysiological and autonomic tests.

Authors:  H O Vallin
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 10.787

7.  Long-term prognosis after acute anterior infarction with atrioventricular block.

Authors:  W R Ginks; R Sutton; W Oh; A Leatham
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1977-02

8.  Long-term prognosis in patients with bundle branch block complicating acute anteroseptal infarction.

Authors:  R N Hauer; K I Lie; K L Liem; D Durrer
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Clinical experience with a bradycardia indicating pacemaker.

Authors:  M Rosenqvist; K O Edhag; H O Vallin
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  The clinical significance of bundle branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. 1. Clinical characteristics, hospital mortality, and one-year follow-up.

Authors:  M C Hindman; G S Wagner; M JaRo; J M Atkins; M M Scheinman; R W DeSanctis; A H Hutter; L Yeatman; M Rubenfire; C Pujura; M Rubin; J J Morris
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.