Literature DB >> 6476828

Evaluation of subsampling and fixation procedures used for counting rumen protozoa.

B A Dehority.   

Abstract

Total numbers of protozoa can be significantly lower in rumen fluid than in whole rumen contents, depending on the time of sampling and the procedure used to separate the fluid and solid fractions. Moreover, generic distribution in rumen fluid was significantly affected in all cases tested. The percentage of Entodinium spp. increased, whereas percentages of Diplodinium spp. and Ophryoscolex spp. decreased. Microscopic observation of fresh and fixed rumen contents did not indicate any marked attachment of protozoa to particulate matter. In addition, dilution of whole rumen contents with water, 5 mM sucrose, or 0.1% Tween 80 before fixation did not affect total numbers or generic composition of protozoa. It was thus concluded that attachment to feed particles is probably not a problem in counting procedures. Blending of whole rumen contents to facilitate subsampling caused a decrease in numbers of protozoa. The concentration of formaldehyde used for preservation of rumen contents, 4, 10, or 18.5%, did not affect the total count.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6476828      PMCID: PMC240360          DOI: 10.1128/aem.48.1.182-185.1984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  14 in total

1.  The development and testing of a method of counting rumen ciliate protozoa.

Authors:  A W BOYNE; J M EADIE; K RAITT
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1957-10

2.  Mode of attack on orchardgrass leaf blades by rumen protozoa.

Authors:  D E Akin; H E Amos
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Rumen protozoal degradation of structurally intact forage tissues.

Authors:  H E Amos; D E Akin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Variation in colony counts of total viable anaerobic rumen bacteria as influenced by media and cultural methods.

Authors:  J A Grubb; B A Dehority
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Maintenance of a certain rumen protozoal population in a continuous in vitro fermentation system.

Authors:  F Nakamura; Y Kurihara
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Densities of ruminal protozoa of sheep established under different dietary conditions.

Authors:  K Nakamura; S Kanegasaki
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Attachment of the ciliate Epidinium Crawley to plant fragments in the sheep rumen.

Authors:  T Bauchop; R T Clarke
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Effect of energy concentration and source of nitrogen on numbers and types of rumen protozoa.

Authors:  S M Dennis; M J Arambel; E E Bartley; A D Dayton
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Some factors controlling the attachment of the rumen holotrich protozoa Isotricha intestinalis and I. prostoma to plant particles in vitro.

Authors:  C G Orpin; A J Letcher
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1978-05

10.  Sequestration of holotrich protozoa in the reticulo-rumen of cattle.

Authors:  M Abe; T Iriki; N Tobe; H Shibui
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  28 in total

1.  Fixation, counting, and manipulation of heterotrophic nanoflagellates.

Authors:  J Bloem; M J Bär-Gilissen; T E Cappenberg
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Development and validation of a real-time PCR method to quantify rumen protozoa and examination of variability between entodinium populations in sheep offered a hay-based diet.

Authors:  Lucy C Skillman; Andrew F Toovey; Andrew J Williams; André-Denis G Wright
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Rumen holotrich ciliate protozoa.

Authors:  A G Williams
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1986-03

4.  Sheep fed with banana leaf hay reduce ruminal protozoa population.

Authors:  Cláudio Eduardo Silva Freitas; Eduardo Robson Duarte; Dorismar David Alves; Isabel Martinele; Marta D'Agosto; Franciane Cedrola; Angélica Alves de Moura Freitas; Franklin Delano Dos Santos Soares; Makenzi Beltran
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 1.559

5.  Occurrence and diurnal population fluctuations of the ruminal protozoan Microcetus lappus.

Authors:  G Towne; T G Nagaraja
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Dasytricha dominance in Surti buffalo rumen revealed by 18S rRNA sequences and real-time PCR assay.

Authors:  K M Singh; A K Tripathi; P R Pandya; D N Rank; R K Kothari; C G Joshi
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-10       Impact factor: 2.188

7.  Stable-isotope probing and metagenomics reveal predation by protozoa drives E. coli removal in slow sand filters.

Authors:  Sarah-Jane Haig; Melanie Schirmer; Rosalinda D'Amore; Joseph Gibbs; Robert L Davies; Gavin Collins; Christopher Quince
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 10.302

8.  Ruminal cellulolytic bacteria and protozoa from bison, cattle-bison hybrids, and cattle fed three alfalfa-corn diets.

Authors:  V H Varel; B A Dehority
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Inclusion of quebracho tannin extract in a high-roughage cattle diet alters digestibility, nitrogen balance, and energy partitioning.

Authors:  Aaron B Norris; Whitney L Crossland; Luis O Tedeschi; Jamie L Foster; James P Muir; William E Pinchak; Mozart A Fonseca
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Feed intake, nutrient digestibility and ruminal fermentation activities in sheep-fed peanut hulls treated with Trichoderma viride or urea.

Authors:  Fawzy M Abo-Donia; Safa N Abdel-Azim; Mona M Y Elghandour; Abdelfattah Z M Salem; Germán Buendía; N A M Soliman
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 1.559

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.