Literature DB >> 6476008

Constitutive fragile sites 1p31, 3p14, 6q26, and 16q23 and their use as controls for false-negative results with the fragile(X).

A Daniel, L Ekblom, S Phillips.   

Abstract

Fragile(X) estimations in fragile(X)-mental retardation hemizygotes or heterozygotes can become falsely negative in stored blood (lymphocytes). This was shown in blood stored (before culture) at 4 degrees C, room temperature (25 degrees C), 37 degrees C, and 39 degrees C for 1-4 days. After storage, blood was cultured in Ham's F10-5% FC serum with 0.1 microM FUdR and scored for fra(X) and the constitutive fragile sites at 3p14 and 6q26. It was found that the proportion of cells expressing the fragile(X) and the 3p14 site varied inversely with the temperature and time of storage. In addition, 50 patients and controls were scored for the three latter sites after routine 72-96-hr culture in F10-0.05 or 0.1 microM FUdR. The 3p14 site was detected in every individual tested in a mean +/- S.D. of 11.3 +/- 3.2% of cells (0.1 microM FUdR). It was found that this site was FUdR dose dependent whereas the 6q26 site was not. The 3p14 (but not the 6q26) site is therefore suitable as a control site for the FUdR effect. It is proposed that repeat studies are necessary when less then 4% 3p14 sites are present in specimens from males referred for fra(X) estimation. Other constitutive fragile sites (eg, 1p31 and 16q23) can also be used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6476008     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320180318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  10 in total

1.  New classes of common fragile sites induced by 5-azacytidine and bromodeoxyuridine.

Authors:  G R Sutherland; M I Parslow; E Baker
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Fragile sites induced by FUdR, caffeine, and aphidicolin. Their frequency, distribution, and analysis.

Authors:  P N Rao; N A Heerema; C G Palmer
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Population cytogenetics of folate-sensitive fragile sites. II. Autosomal rare fragile sites.

Authors:  M Kähkönen; C Tengström; T Alitalo; R Matilainen; M Kaski; E Airaksinen
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Rare, polymorphic, and common fragile sites: a classification.

Authors:  F Hecht
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Variation in the expression of aphidicolin-induced fragile sites in human lymphocyte cultures.

Authors:  A P Craig-Holmes; L C Strong; A Goodacre; S Pathak
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  The effect of hydroxyurea on the expression of the common fragile site at 3p14.

Authors:  Z A Yan; X Z Li; X T Zhou
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Induction of sister chromatid exchanges at common fragile sites.

Authors:  T W Glover; C K Stein
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  The most common fragile site in man is 3p14.

Authors:  D F Smeets; J M Scheres; T W Hustinx
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Genetic linkage heterogeneity in the fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  W T Brown; A C Gross; C B Chan; E C Jenkins
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  The role of fluorinated pyrimidine analogues in the induction of the in vitro expression of the fragile X chromosome.

Authors:  B Vandamme; I Liebaers; L Hens; J L Bernheim; C Roobol
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 4.132

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.