Literature DB >> 6475917

The determinants of actinic skin damage: problems of confounding among environmental and constitutional variables.

C D Holman, P R Evans, G J Lumsden, B K Armstrong.   

Abstract

Constitutional and environmental determinants of actinic skin damage, assessed by cutaneous microtopography, were evaluated in 1,216 subjects attending the 1981 Busselton Health Survey in Western Australia. Increasing age, male sex, the tendency to burn on exposure to sunlight and outdoor occupation were found to have independent predictive value for the presence of actinic skin damage. Crude positive and inverse associations of actinic skin damage with several other factors were shown to arise from confounding. Effect measures for outdoor leisure pursuits and sunscreen use were underestimated due to inverse associations of these factors with older age, and inverse associations of high-exposure outdoor activities with poor skin response to sunlight. Associations of constitutional traits typical of fair individuals and sunscreen use with the tendency to burn resulted in overestimation of effect measures. Empirical relationships of actinic skin damage with certain leisure activities and with use of sunscreens were also confounded by sex. The results indicate a need for greater attention to confounding in nonexperimental skin cancer research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6475917     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  8 in total

1.  Predictors for cutaneous basal- and squamous-cell carcinoma among actinically damaged adults.

Authors:  J A Foote; R B Harris; A R Giuliano; D J Roe; T E Moon; B Cartmel; D S Alberts
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2001-01-20       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  The relationship between cumulative lifetime ultraviolet radiation exposure, bone mineral density, falls risk and fractures in older adults.

Authors:  M J W Thompson; D A Aitken; P Otahal; J Cicolini; T M Winzenberg; G Jones
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Sun protection for preventing basal cell and squamous cell skin cancers.

Authors:  Guillermo Sánchez; John Nova; Andrea Esperanza Rodriguez-Hernandez; Roger David Medina; Carolina Solorzano-Restrepo; Jenny Gonzalez; Miguel Olmos; Kathie Godfrey; Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-25

Review 4.  Sun exposure and non-melanocytic skin cancer.

Authors:  A Kricker; B K Armstrong; D R English
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Predictors of gender differences in sunscreen use and screening outcome among skin cancer screening participants.

Authors:  L L Hourani; B LaFleur
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1995-10

6.  Non-melanoma skin cancer: an evaluation of risk in terms of ultraviolet exposure.

Authors:  M Morales Suárez-Varela; A Llopis González; E Ferrer Caraco
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Past exposure to sun, skin phenotype, and risk of multiple sclerosis: case-control study.

Authors:  I A F van der Mei; A-L Ponsonby; T Dwyer; L Blizzard; R Simmons; B V Taylor; H Butzkueven; T Kilpatrick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-08-09

8.  Actinic skin damage and mortality--the First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Epidemiologic Follow-up Study.

Authors:  Wei He; Fei Zhu; Xiaoguang Ma; Xinyu Zhao; Min Zheng; Zhao Chen; Steven B Heymsfield; Shankuan Zhu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.