Literature DB >> 647590

Quantitative assessment of the quality of medical care provided in five family practices before and after attachment of a family practice nurse.

L W Chambers, M Burke, J Ross, R Cantwell.   

Abstract

The standards of patient care were maintained in five urban medical practices after the introduction of family practice nurses. Evaluations were achieved before and after their appointment by the indicator condition method. Minimal explicit criteria for the management of patients with 12 indicator conditions and by the use of 14 drugs were approved by an ad hoc peer group of community physicians. These cirteria were applied to the five practices by the use of a single-blind design and the abstraction of unaltered medical records. A standardized score for each practic e permitted comparison of scores for the management of indicator conditions and for the clinical use of drugs before and after attachment of the family practice nurses. For each of the indicator conditions and the drugs assessed in the five practices similar levels of adequacy were observed in the two study periods. These explicit (objective) audit resutls agreed with the implicit (subjective) assessments of the family practice nurses by their physician colleagues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 647590      PMCID: PMC1818739     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Med Assoc J        ISSN: 0008-4409            Impact factor:   8.262


  12 in total

1.  Peer review by criteria mapping: criteria for diabetes mellitus. The use of decision-making in chart audit.

Authors:  S Greenfield; C E Lewis; S H Kaplan; M B Davidson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  THE OFFICE PRACTICE OF INTERNISTS. I. THE FEASIBILITY OF EVALUATING QUALITY OF CARE.

Authors:  H H KROEGER; I ALTMAN; D A CLARK; A C JOHNSON; C G SHEPS
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1965-08-02       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The role of new health practitioners in a prepaid group practice: provider differences in process and outcomes of medical care.

Authors:  D M Levine; L L Morlock; A I Mushlin; S Shapiro; F E Malitz
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Evaluation of infant health care by a nurse practitioner.

Authors:  J A Chappell; P A Drogos
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Primary child health care by family nurse practitioners.

Authors:  R A Greenberg; F A Loda; C G Pickard; P Collins; B S Compton; G O Hargraves; M J Wilkman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  The use of nurse practitioners in a general practice.

Authors:  J H Merenstein; H Wolfe; K M Barker
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  A controlled test of the use of registered nurses for prenatal care.

Authors:  E R Schlesinger; W D Lowery; D B Glaser; M D Milliones; S Mazumdar
Journal:  Health Serv Rep       Date:  1973-05

8.  Jamestown Medical Clinic System.

Authors:  J D Voltmann
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1975-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Physician management in primary care.

Authors:  B S Hulka; L L Kupper; J C Cassel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Quality assessment in hypertension: analysis of process and outcome methods.

Authors:  F T Nobrega; G W Morrow; R K Smoldt; K P Offord
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-01-20       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

1.  The impact of continuing education on the quality of patient care.

Authors:  K V Rudnick; W P Fraser; J C Sibley; V R Neufeld; D L Sackett; B A Gerrard
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 3.275

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.