Literature DB >> 64746

Prevention of postoperative thromboembolism by dextran 40, low doses of heparin, or xantinol nicotinate.

U F Gruber, F Duckert, R Fridrich, J Torhorst, J Rem.   

Abstract

The efficacy of dextran-40 infusions or low-dose heparin or xantinol-nicotinate administration in preventing postoperative thromboembolic complications has been investigated in a prospective, controlled, randomised trial as part of an international multicentre trial. 382 patients over the age of forty years undergoing elective major general surgery were investigated; 100 had a complete protocol in the control, 94 in the heparin, 92 in the dextran, and 32 in the xantinol-nicotinate group. 31 patients died: 13 in the control group, 10 in the heparin group, 6 in the dextran group, and 2 in the xantinol-nicotinate group. In 4 controls, 6 in the heparin group, and 1 in the dextran group the cause of death was acute pulmonary embolism. 4 further controls, 1 in the heparin group, and 2 in the dextran group had emboli found at necropsy, which either contributed to the deaths or were incidental findings. The distribution of pulmonary emboli in this study did not show the difference between the control and the heparin group reported in the multicentre trial. The 125I-fibrinogen test was done in all patients. The frequency of isotopic deep-vein thrombosis was 36-0% in the controls, 12-8% in the heparin group, 21-7% in the dextran group, and 40-6% in the xantinol-nicotinate group. The difference between the controls and the heparin groups was highly significant and between the control and the dextran group, probably significant. There were significantly more side-effects in the heparin group than in the dextran group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 64746     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(77)91011-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  9 in total

1.  Surgical debate. We still have insufficient evidence to support perioperative heparin prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  G Sutton; S Hosking; C D Johnson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Can we really prevent postoperative pulmonary emboli?

Authors:  J R Mitchell
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-06-09

3.  Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism: analysis of cost effectiveness.

Authors:  E W Salzman; G C Davies
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Failure of low dose heparin to prevent pulmonary embolism after hip surgery or above the knee amputation.

Authors:  J W Williams; E A Eikman; S H Greenberg; J C Hewitt; E Lopez-Cuenca; G P Jones; J A Madden
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Deep venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing inguinal lymph node dissection for melanoma.

Authors:  J M Arbeit; S F Lowry; B R Line; D C Jones; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Dihydroergotamine and heparin or heparin alone for the prevention of postoperative thromboembolism in gynecology.

Authors:  M K Hohl; K P Lüscher; M Annaheim; R Fridrich; U F Gruber
Journal:  Arch Gynecol       Date:  1980

7.  Prophylaxis of postoperative venous thrombosis in a controlled trial comparing dextran 70 and low-dose heparin.

Authors:  D Bergqvist; T Hallböök
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Low dose heparin: bleeding and wound complications in the surgical patient. A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  H L Pachter; T S Riles
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism in general surgical patients. Results of meta-analysis.

Authors:  G P Clagett; J S Reisch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 12.969

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.