Literature DB >> 6470778

Absent or compressed basal cisterns on first CT scan: ominous predictors of outcome in severe head injury.

S M Toutant, M R Klauber, L F Marshall, B M Toole, S A Bowers, J M Seelig, J B Varnell.   

Abstract

The relationship of outcome to the appearance of the basal cisterns as seen on initial computerized tomography (CT) scanning was assessed in 218 consecutive severely head-injured patients entered into the second phase of the National Pilot Traumatic Coma Data Bank. Outcome could be directly related to the status of the basal cisterns on the initial CT scan. The mortality rates were 77%, 39%, and 22% among those with absent, compressed, and normal basal cisterns, respectively. This association between cisterns and outcome was shown to be strong after adjusting for Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (p less than 0.001). The state of the cisterns was more important for those with higher GCS scores (scores 6 to 8) than for those with lower scores (scores 3 to 5). Patients with GCS scores of 6 to 8, with cisterns absent or not visualized, suffered nearly a fourfold additional risk of poor outcome, compared to those with normal cisterns. This indicates that the status of the cisterns can be used as an early noninvasive method of identifying patients at high risk of death or severe disability, in whom the initial neurological examination would potentially suggest otherwise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6470778     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1984.61.4.0691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  25 in total

1.  Surgical treatment of space-occupying cerebellar infarctions--4 1/2 years post-operative follow-up.

Authors:  H Klugkist; J McCarthy
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Does the brain become heavier or lighter after trauma? The long story of brain water content and its direct or indirect measurement.

Authors:  Nino Stocchetti
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Non-invasive methods of estimating intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Jamie B Rosenberg; Ariel L Shiloh; Richard H Savel; Lewis A Eisen
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Fundamentals of transorbital sonographic evaluation of optic nerve sheath expansion under intracranial hypertension. I. Experimental study.

Authors:  K Helmke; H C Hansen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1996-10

5.  Magnetization transfer imaging and proton MR spectroscopy in the evaluation of axonal injury: correlation with clinical outcome after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  G Sinson; L J Bagley; K M Cecil; M Torchia; J C McGowan; R E Lenkinski; T K McIntosh; R I Grossman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Non-invasive intracranial pressure assessment.

Authors:  Llewellyn C Padayachy
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 7.  Noninvasive methods of detecting increased intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Wen Xu; Patrick Gerety; Tomas Aleman; Jordan Swanson; Jesse Taylor
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Neuroanatomical predictors of awakening in acutely comatose patients.

Authors:  Robert G Kowalski; Manuel M Buitrago; Josh Duckworth; Zachary D Chonka; H Adrian Puttgen; Robert D Stevens; Romergryko G Geocadin
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  CT brain scan in acute water intoxication.

Authors:  V M Berginer; A Osimani; J Berginer; E Barmeir
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Decompressive Craniectomy in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: Are the Usual Indications Congruent with Those Evaluated in Clinical Trials?

Authors:  Andreas H Kramer; Nathan Deis; Stacy Ruddell; Philippe Couillard; David A Zygun; Christopher J Doig; Clare Gallagher
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.210

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.