Literature DB >> 6470652

Division of constricted and urethane-treated sand dollar eggs: a test of the polar stimulation hypothesis.

R Rappaport, B N Rappaport.   

Abstract

In spherical cells with a central mitotic apparatus, the centers of the asters are closer to the poles than to the equator. This circumstance is basic to several hypothetical explanations of the way in which the mitotic apparatus establishes the division mechanism. This investigation was designed to determine whether that geometrical relationship is necessary for division. Fertilized, mechanically denuded sand dollar eggs were inserted into glass loops, which reduced the diameter in the constriction plane from the normal 142 to 78-80 microns and partly constricted the cell into equal parts. The mitotic apparatus straddled the constriction, and its length was not significantly changed. The manipulation increased the distance from the astral centers to the poles and decreased the distance from the astral centers to the equator to a degree that reversed the normal distance relations. These cells divided normally. Ethyl urethane (0.06 M) reduces the size of the mitotic apparatus and blocks cleavage in spherical cells. When treated cells are confined in 80-microns i.d. capillaries, they divide. Treated cells also divide when they are constricted by an 80-microns i.d. glass loop if the mitotic apparatus straddles the constriction. An equal degree of constriction in the subfurrow and subpolar areas did not reverse the effect of urethane. The results demonstrate that cleavage does not depend on the normal distance relation between the mitotic apparatus and the poles, and that the urethane effect can be remedied only by reducing the distance between the mitotic apparatus and the equatorial surface. Both findings are inconsistent with the polar stimulation hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6470652     DOI: 10.1002/jez.1402310111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Zool        ISSN: 0022-104X


  6 in total

1.  Induction of cytokinesis is independent of precisely regulated microtubule dynamics.

Authors:  Laila I Strickland; Erin J Donnelly; David R Burgess
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 4.138

2.  Localization of cytokinesis factors to the future cell division site by microtubule-dependent transport.

Authors:  Erdinc Atilgan; David Burgess; Fred Chang
Journal:  Cytoskeleton (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-09-21

3.  Parameters that specify the timing of cytokinesis.

Authors:  C B Shuster; D R Burgess
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1999-09-06       Impact factor: 10.539

4.  Simulation testing of mechanisms for inducing the formation of the contractile ring in cytokinesis.

Authors:  A K Harris; S L Gewalt
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 10.539

5.  A model for astral stimulation of cytokinesis in animal cells.

Authors:  J J Devore; G W Conrad; R Rappaport
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 10.539

6.  The distribution of cytoplasmic microtubules throughout the cell cycle of the centric diatom Stephanopyxis turris: their role in nuclear migration and positioning the mitotic spindle during cytokinesis.

Authors:  L Wordeman; K L McDonald; W Z Cande
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 10.539

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.