Literature DB >> 6470098

Development of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for determination of lysozyme in human parotid and submandibular-sublingual salivas.

B J MacKay, H Goodman, D Cox, B L Grossbard, V J Iacono, J J Pollock.   

Abstract

The specificity of lysozyme determinations in human parotid and submandibular-sublingual salivas of two subjects was assessed by comparison of lysozyme concentrations in native acidified salivas with purified enzyme obtained by immunoadsorbent fractionation of the salivas. Lysozyme concentrations were measured by the turbidimetric catalytic method and by a newly developed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The validity of the assays was established by comparing assay results with enzyme concentration values determined from optical density-extinction coefficient calculations of the purified lysozyme peak. Values for purified enzyme were found to be similar, irrespective of the assay used to determine lysozyme concentrations, and were in agreement with extinction coefficient calculations. Based on the ELISA technique, recoveries of lysozyme from both parotid and submandibular-sublingual salivas were greater than 75 and 90%, respectively. Similar recoveries were noted for parotid saliva when determinations were based on the turbidimetric assay. However, the ELISA and turbidimetric assays differed with respect to lysozyme levels in submandibular-sublingual saliva because of the apparent presence of an enhancement factor which gave rise to higher lysozyme values in the catalytic assay and therefore resulted in low recoveries of purified enzyme. This catalytic enhancement factor was present in the nonadsorbed fraction of both subjects, as higher lysozyme activities were noted when nonadsorbed fractions were added to affinity-purified lysozymes. Lysozyme levels were also determined in the parotid and submandibular-sublingual salivas of caries-resistant and -susceptible adults. In general, levels of lysozyme in parotid saliva were lower in comparison to submandibular -sublingual saliva; however, significant differences in enzyme concentration were not evident between the caries-resistant and caries-susceptible subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6470098      PMCID: PMC271196          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.19.6.844-848.1984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  24 in total

1.  Binding of N-acetyl-chitotriose to human lysozyme.

Authors:  S Kuramitsu; K Ikeda; K Hamaguchi; S Miwa; K Nakashima
Journal:  J Biochem       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 3.387

2.  Factors influencing lysozyme determinations by the lysoplate method.

Authors:  T L Peeters; G R Vantrappen
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  1977-02-01       Impact factor: 3.786

3.  Editorial: Lysozyme.

Authors:  E F Osserman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1975-02-20       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Reliability of enzymatic lysozyme determinations.

Authors:  T Tepper; S Meijer; G Brouwer-Pijpen
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Measurement of salivary lysozyme.

Authors:  G Virella; J Goudswaard
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Quantitative assay of immunoglobulin G.

Authors:  E Engvall; P Perlmann
Journal:  Immunochemistry       Date:  1971-09

7.  Simplified method for collection of pure submandibular saliva in large volumes.

Authors:  E L Truelove; D Bixler; A D Merritt
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1967 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  Immunochemical determination of human lysozyme by laser nephelometry.

Authors:  J Goudswaard; G Virella
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Determination of lysozyme in tears by immunoturbidimetric and optimised kinetic bacteriolytic methods.

Authors:  P Mörsky; E Aine
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 3.786

10.  Effect of agarose variability on the measurement of lysozyme activity.

Authors:  R A Greenwald; W W Moy
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  1976-12-01       Impact factor: 3.786

View more
  1 in total

1.  Dose‑dependent effect of lysozyme upon Candida albicans biofilm.

Authors:  Sarra Sebaa; Nicolas Hizette; Zahia Boucherit-Otmani; Philippe Courtois
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 2.952

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.