Literature DB >> 6468783

The auditory brain stem response reliably predicts hearing loss in graduates of a tertiary intensive care nursery.

R Galambos, G E Hicks, M J Wilson.   

Abstract

Babies (N = 642) were tested for auditory disorder, using the auditory brain stem response (ABR), at the time of their discharge from a tertiary intensive care nursery (ICN). Of those with ABR threshold elevation in one or both ears (N = 97), 61% (N = 59) were retested some months later by a battery of audiological tests; 21 (N = 3.3% of the 642) suffered binaural peripheral loss and 11 (1.7%) now wear hearing aids. These new data, when combined with similar data previously reported from the same ICN, yield a sample of 1613 babies examined during a 5.8-year period from which these conclusions emerge: (1) About 16% of our ICN babies leave the hospital with reduced sensitivity in one or both ears; (2) the hearing deficiency is permanent for 8 to 10%; (3) the loss is sensorineural, bilateral, and so severe for about 4% that hearing aids will be required to optimize their language and psychosocial development. Use of the ABR procedure for neonatal hearing testing is the target of several criticisms: it is being applied too early in life; its predictions about permanent hearing loss are unacceptably inaccurate; or/and it is too costly. We discuss these and still other objections that have been raised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6468783     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-198407000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  8 in total

1.  Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Tiffany A Johnson; Jan R Kaminski; Kathryn L Beauchaine; Cassie A Garner; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Click evoked otoacoustic emissions compared with brain stem electric response.

Authors:  J C Stevens; H D Webb; J Hutchinson; J Connell; M F Smith; J T Buffin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 3.  Neonatal hearing screening.

Authors:  A M Oudesluys-Murphy; H L van Straaten; R Bholasingh; G A van Zanten
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Air and Bone Conduction Click and Tone-Burst Auditory Brainstem Thresholds Using Kalman Adaptive Processing in Nonsedated Normal-Hearing Infants.

Authors:  Alaaeldin M Elsayed; Lisa L Hunter; Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; David K Brown; Jareen K Meinzen-Derr; Kelly Baroch; Maureen Sullivan-Mahoney; Kara Francis; Leigh G Schaid
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  The costs of early hearing screening in England and Wales.

Authors:  J C Stevens; D M Hall; A Davis; C M Davies; S Dixon
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Evaluation of an automated auditory brainstem response infant hearing screening method in at risk neonates.

Authors:  H L van Straaten; M E Groote; A M Oudesluys-Murphy
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.183

7.  Neonatal at risk screening and the identification of deafness.

Authors:  P M Watkin; M Baldwin; G McEnery
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Evaluation of auditory brainstem responses for hearing screening of high-risk infants.

Authors:  R G Aiyer; Bhavin Parikh
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-03-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.