Literature DB >> 6468779

Laboratory projects in tactile aids to lipreading.

C L De Filippo.   

Abstract

Four studies are reported on the design of tactile aids to lipreading conducted at Central Institute for the Deaf, St. Louis. A speech feature aid represented resonance, envelope, and source characteristics of speech on three vibrators at the fingertips. Artificially-deafened and congenitally deaf adults lipreading with the aid obtained an average of 40% gain over lipreading alone on syllable identification tests, but minimal gain for untrained words. In a series of three other studies, the quality of tactile sensation was developed as a cue to spectral information, presented in a temporal code based on the overall time-intensity waveform of speech. Electrical and vibratory stimulation on the hand and torso were evaluated by artificially-deafened adults using the tracking technique with connected speech. Short-term training yielded variable increments over unaided lipreading scores and lipreading with a simple vibrator aid. Neither the feature nor the spectral code was superior in aiding lipreading. The displays that produced quality changes seemed more efficient for training than the spatial display. Results were affected also by content and method of training and initial lipreading proficiency.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6468779     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-198407000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  3 in total

Review 1.  Lipreading: A Review of Its Continuing Importance for Speech Recognition With an Acquired Hearing Loss and Possibilities for Effective Training.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein; Nicole Jordan; Edward T Auer; Silvio P Eberhardt
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 1.636

Review 2.  Electro-Haptic Stimulation: A New Approach for Improving Cochlear-Implant Listening.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Carl A Verschuur
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Multisensory training can promote or impede visual perceptual learning of speech stimuli: visual-tactile vs. visual-auditory training.

Authors:  Silvio P Eberhardt; Edward T Auer; Lynne E Bernstein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.